ANTH245 2007-09-24: Difference between revisions
From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
5. HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES → SCAVENGERS (e.g. Raven, Coyote) | 5. HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES → SCAVENGERS (e.g. Raven, Coyote) | ||
6. ERGO, Ravens symbolize overcoming the opposition between life and death | 6. ERGO, Ravens symbolize overcoming the opposition between life and death | ||
* A logic of symbols | |||
* Compare to [[wikipedia:Chiasmus|chiasmus]] | ** '''Animals are good to think with''' | ||
** Compare to ''dialectic'' | |||
** Compare to [[wikipedia:Chiasmus|chiasmus]] | |||
== The canonical formula of myth == | == The canonical formula of myth == | ||
* Explain what the formula means (unpack it into three transforms) | * Explain what the formula means (unpack it into three transforms) | ||
** x(a) : y(b) :: x(b) : a<sup>-1</sup>(y) | |||
0. x(a) : y(b) | |||
1. x(b) : y(a) REVERSAL of arguments (a,b) | |||
2. x(b) : a(y) REVERSAL of function and argument (a,y) | |||
3. x(b) : 1/a(y) INVERSION of function a(y) | |||
* Example? | |||
* Briefly mention Mosko's work | * Briefly mention Mosko's work | ||
Line 71: | Line 79: | ||
* leftover words become "feedback data" | * leftover words become "feedback data" | ||
== Results == | |||
* Exkimo = Traval/Place, Perception | |||
* Kwaikiutl = Travel/Place | |||
* Egypt = Social Power | |||
* India = Affective/Rational | |||
* China = Affective/Rational | |||
== Observations == | == Observations == | ||
* Note role of feedback | * Note role of feedback | ||
Line 76: | Line 90: | ||
** E.g. bimodal results may be the result of conflating two story types | ** E.g. bimodal results may be the result of conflating two story types | ||
== Cultural | == Cultural Patterns == | ||
* Discuss the model | |||
* "Culture Models" | |||
** These mediate human communication and interaction | |||
* Patterns and Templates | |||
** Encoding/Decoding | |||
* PUT ON BOARD | |||
** Mimics method | |||
== Comparisons == | == Comparisons == | ||
* L-S | * L-S | ||
Line 88: | Line 110: | ||
= Selby = | = Selby = | ||
* | == The ETHNOGRAPH == | ||
* QDA software | |||
* Instead of myths, field notes and transcriptions of discourse | * Instead of myths, field notes and transcriptions of discourse | ||
* A kind of data mining | * A kind of data mining | ||
* http://www.qualisresearch.com/default.htm | |||
== The Method: Noticing, Collecting, Thinking == | |||
* Iterative and Progressive -- i.e.cybernetic (an index of the pervasiveness of the ideology) | |||
* Recursive (self-referential?) | |||
* Holographic (part/whole) | |||
=== Noticing === | |||
* Two levels: patterns and codes | |||
* Patterns are recorded (and selected) | |||
* Codes are discerned in the patterns | |||
=== Collecting === | |||
* Puzzle analogy --> See L-S on the camshaft | |||
* Assemble the codes into a larger framework | |||
** e.g. L-S's matrices ... | |||
=== Thinking === | |||
* Thinking about the larger framework (e.g. L-S's canonical formula of myth) | |||
* Understanding the "holes" | |||
* Left-brain | |||
== Questions == | |||
* What is the status of the codes? | * What is the status of the codes? | ||
* Heuristic vs. Objective status of the codes | ** Heuristic vs. Objective status of the codes | ||
* | * What is the status of the interpretation? | ||
= Tobin and the HRAF = | = Tobin and the HRAF = | ||
Line 99: | Line 142: | ||
* http://pulproxy.princeton.edu/connect | * http://pulproxy.princeton.edu/connect | ||
* Murdock's World Atlas | * Murdock's World Atlas | ||
=== The OWC === | |||
* See book | |||
* Compare to Colby, Selby ... | |||
* BECOMING REFLEXIVE NOW ... | |||
== What is a computer? == | == What is a computer? == | ||
== Why the controversy? == | == Why the controversy? == |
Latest revision as of 17:28, 24 September 2007
Business
- Responses ...
Recap
The transformational process
- Review the basic idea of how the linear order is translated into a structural pattern
- A primary and unmediable opposition is posited and successively replaced by more mediable categories, e.g.
0. LIEF : DEATH → ??? 1. LIFE : DEATH :: FARMING : WARFARE 2. FARMING : WARFARE → HUNTING 3. HUNTING replaces WARFARE 4. FARMING : HUNTING :: HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES 5. HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES → SCAVENGERS (e.g. Raven, Coyote) 6. ERGO, Ravens symbolize overcoming the opposition between life and death
- A logic of symbols
- Animals are good to think with
- Compare to dialectic
- Compare to chiasmus
The canonical formula of myth
- Explain what the formula means (unpack it into three transforms)
- x(a) : y(b) :: x(b) : a-1(y)
0. x(a) : y(b) 1. x(b) : y(a) REVERSAL of arguments (a,b) 2. x(b) : a(y) REVERSAL of function and argument (a,y) 3. x(b) : 1/a(y) INVERSION of function a(y)
- Example?
- Briefly mention Mosko's work
Who is communicating with whom?
- Describe the process as a two-stage operation
- Story is received and parsed for consciousness consumption
- Generates a second story, which is parsed for unconscious consumption
- The big question -- In the case of the second process, who communicates with whom?
Segue
The Computer as symbol and as tool
- Taking Levi-Strauss' references to the computer seriously
Computing and the Database
- All of L-S's references to cybernetics and computing are really references to computing
- Databases represent structure
- Databases represent (logical) possibility
Colby
General Inquirer System
- The IBM 7090
- Current system
- EXERCISE:
- Pick an essay and dump it in
- Discuss results
- EXERCISE:
The Process
- Text + Thesaurus (Dictionary) + Rules
- Word counts
- Correlations
Text
- 9,000 stories
- 5 culture areas
- Translated into English
Dictionary
- Three categories
- Hi freq && polysemous
- Med freq && polysemous
- Monosemous
- Mapped to themes
- Based on Clyde Kluckhon's categories
- Binary
- Later called "conceptual domains"
Rules
- Actually a SQL join ...
- leftover words become "feedback data"
Results
- Exkimo = Traval/Place, Perception
- Kwaikiutl = Travel/Place
- Egypt = Social Power
- India = Affective/Rational
- China = Affective/Rational
Observations
- Note role of feedback
- Flattening of stories unless filtered ahead of time
- E.g. bimodal results may be the result of conflating two story types
Cultural Patterns
- Discuss the model
- "Culture Models"
- These mediate human communication and interaction
- Patterns and Templates
- Encoding/Decoding
- PUT ON BOARD
- Mimics method
Comparisons
- L-S
- Same premises, different units and rules
- Premises: structure = elements + rules
- Units: mythemes vs. words that signify conceptual domains
- Same premises, different units and rules
- Rappaport
- Compare culture patterns and schema to R's sacred propositions
- Bateson
- Patterns
Selby
The ETHNOGRAPH
- QDA software
- Instead of myths, field notes and transcriptions of discourse
- A kind of data mining
- http://www.qualisresearch.com/default.htm
The Method: Noticing, Collecting, Thinking
- Iterative and Progressive -- i.e.cybernetic (an index of the pervasiveness of the ideology)
- Recursive (self-referential?)
- Holographic (part/whole)
Noticing
- Two levels: patterns and codes
- Patterns are recorded (and selected)
- Codes are discerned in the patterns
Collecting
- Puzzle analogy --> See L-S on the camshaft
- Assemble the codes into a larger framework
- e.g. L-S's matrices ...
Thinking
- Thinking about the larger framework (e.g. L-S's canonical formula of myth)
- Understanding the "holes"
- Left-brain
Questions
- What is the status of the codes?
- Heuristic vs. Objective status of the codes
- What is the status of the interpretation?
Tobin and the HRAF
The HRAF
- http://pulproxy.princeton.edu/connect
- Murdock's World Atlas
The OWC
- See book
- Compare to Colby, Selby ...
- BECOMING REFLEXIVE NOW ...
What is a computer?
Why the controversy?
- The status of "codes"
- Violence to texts