Causes for Concern: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
<h2>Potentially Worse and More Complicated Negative Side Effects</h2> | <h2>Potentially Worse and More Complicated Negative Side Effects</h2> | ||
Most drugs have side effects and are regulated as a result. However, most side effects remain unknown until the drug is actually tested in a large enough population. | Most drugs have side effects and are regulated as a result. However, most side effects remain unknown until the drug is actually tested in a large enough population. Drugs have been recalled as a result of their side effects but only after a number of people were affected. | ||
However, with genetic engineering especially, the stakes are higher. The genetic manipulation cannot be 'recalled' and may not be able to be treated since genes are more fundamental and their interactions are likely more complicated and less understood than conventional drugs. | |||
This problem gets worse in the next stage. | |||
<h1>Stage 2</h1> | <h1>Stage 2</h1> | ||
| Line 29: | Line 27: | ||
Negative externalities are costs borne by third parties not involved in the transaction that gave rise to the cost. In the case of the family, parents who may even be seeking the best interest of their children may make genetic decisions for their children that may have several types of negative consequences. These negative externalities will be born primarily by the children and may have varying degrees of seriousness. | Negative externalities are costs borne by third parties not involved in the transaction that gave rise to the cost. In the case of the family, parents who may even be seeking the best interest of their children may make genetic decisions for their children that may have several types of negative consequences. These negative externalities will be born primarily by the children and may have varying degrees of seriousness. | ||
Given the afore-mentioned 'blurry line' these genetic decisions could start with small increases in memory capacity of the child (similar to Ritalin) but eventually lead to the addition of traits that may be simply be considered favorable in a particular culture at a particular point in time. Such things as ultrathin girls, pliable boys, or even red hair (as Fukuyama suggests) may change within the culture and from one generation to the next or may even be harmful to the child irrespective of generation or culture. | Given the afore-mentioned 'blurry line' these genetic decisions could start with small increases in memory capacity of the child (similar to Ritalin) but eventually lead to the addition of traits that may be simply be considered favorable in a particular culture at a particular point in time. Such things as "ultrathin girls, pliable boys, or [even] red hair" (as Fukuyama suggests) may change within the culture and from one generation to the next or may even be harmful to the child irrespective of generation or culture. | ||
What makes such decisions particularly harmful is that a child can change his/her ideas or practices but it would be substantially more difficult for him/her to change his/her own genetic make-up or genotype. One can even imagine a situation in which a gene manipulation (although the term 'gene treatment' may eventually be preferred) that results in an unforseen but significant harmful side effect. Let us say for instance that the side effect involves a painful disorder or a signficant succeptibility to a certain virulent disease. These conditions will be suffered by the child and all its descendants. Are they then to suffer and forego children of their own for what could have been a superficial enhancement that their parents chose? | |||
<h2>Let the Competition Begin!</h2> | <h2>Let the Competition Begin!</h2> | ||
| Line 42: | Line 35: | ||
Eventually, as genetic engineering becomes widespread enough that differences between the haves and haves-not become noticeable, there will be an increased demand for treatments (i.e. improvements) for children who may be entering a generation of unskilled, skilled, and 'super-skilled' workers. Aside from those parents who may end up warring with their peers to see who can get the better upgrade for the child for their own glory, there may be parents who feel that unless they help (i.e. improve) their children, all of their progeny may be doomed to become members of some genetically inferior underclass. | Eventually, as genetic engineering becomes widespread enough that differences between the haves and haves-not become noticeable, there will be an increased demand for treatments (i.e. improvements) for children who may be entering a generation of unskilled, skilled, and 'super-skilled' workers. Aside from those parents who may end up warring with their peers to see who can get the better upgrade for the child for their own glory, there may be parents who feel that unless they help (i.e. improve) their children, all of their progeny may be doomed to become members of some genetically inferior underclass. | ||
Even currently, with our competitive job market and | Even currently, with our competitive job market and consumerist culture, sociologists such as Austin Bunn are saying that we have already gone from parenting to "product development." (NYT Magazine, 2002). Genetic Engineering will simply allow parents to do this more efficiently. | ||
On an even larger scale, consider Japan's somewhat miraculous post-war economic recovery. This economic growth with such limited natural resources was mainly due to its investment in human resources and later, technology. Imagine if a nation, Nation X, were to eventually reach a stage (whether through state laws or the process just described) where its labor force were | On an even larger scale, consider Japan's somewhat miraculous post-war economic recovery. This economic growth with such limited natural resources was mainly due to its investment in human resources (education) and later, technology. Imagine if a nation, Nation X, were to eventually reach a stage (whether through state laws or the process just described) where its labor force were genetically enhanced to make them more efficient and productive. Nations desiring to become or remain economically strong relative to others would then have a greater incentive to 'improve' their workforces. At this point, governments may not even have to use force but only financial incentives, patriotic calls to their citizens in the interest of the nation's survival, or even just good advertising. | ||
Neo-mercantilists would also see this as a cause for concern since | Neo-mercantilists would also see this as a cause for concern since Nation X could invest more money in its military and this would not be favorable for national security (in the realist world, it is capability not intentions that matter). | ||
But why even bother with the economy? Why not just gentically engineer superhuman soldiers? There would, of course, have to be the ability to control such soldiers especially if a large number are, for lack of a better word (or not), created. This could take several different slavish forms, from neurological adjustments to implants all of which would be dehumanizing. | But why even bother with the economy? Why not just gentically engineer superhuman soldiers? There would, of course, have to be the ability to control such soldiers especially if a large number are, for lack of a better word (or not), created. This could take several different slavish forms, from neurological adjustments to implants all of which would be dehumanizing. | ||
But whether the competition is sociological, economic, political (which includes military), it will likely act as a catalyst towards full-scale, worldwide eugenics, that is, if the number of human casualties from the countless possible genetic mistakes does not stop it first. | |||
<h1>Stage 3</h1> | <h1>Stage 3</h1> | ||
<h2>Humans? What humans?</h2> | <h2>Humans? What humans?</h2> | ||
If genetic manipulation continues through a prolonged period of time of intense competition, eventually a point will be reached at which the existing species will be so specified that it will be more of a cumulative human creation than it will be human. Members of this new species may have a constant feeling of 'happiness' but have no memories of interpersonal experiences that caused the happiness. Since a person's specifications have become so important, people are valued based on their capabilities and thus only on their utility. Some members may therefore become 'obsolete' before the end of their lifetime, which, by this time, may be very long. But it's 'okay,' they will probably still be 'happy,' because they are hard-wired to be. This species may likely have less interpersonal needs, family may become obsolete or may only exist for structural purposes. Love -that which many would see today as the most powerful aspect of human nature, would not be possible in a utilitarian society such as this. If its members see each other as having only instrumental value without any inherent dignity, then every relationship would be selfish since people would only use each other for utility or instrumental value instead of sacrificing for each other after recognizing each other's innate worth. | |||
In the end, this new non-human species may exist more like robots than humans after we would have inadvertently brought about the extinction of humanity. | |||
Latest revision as of 04:11, 3 January 2008
This second period of Eugenics has the potential to be far more harmful to mankind than the first. The following causes for concern follow the three stages mentioned earlier in the Return of Eugenics. Each general concern only becomes worse as another stage is entered.
Stage 1
Increased Difficulty in Predicting Side Effects
The greater the number of gene interactions involved, the greater the number of possible outcomes. Also, the higher the complexity level of these interactions, the higher the probablity of side effects resulting from a change in the process or any of the genes involved in that process. Thus not only would it be more difficult to predict all side effects, there would be a greater likelihood of them occurring.
However, as noted before,
- “[The fact] that the multiple functions of genes and gene interactions are highly complex does not mean that all human genetic engineering will be on hold until we understand them. No technology ever develops in this fashion. New drugs are invented, tested, and approved for use all the time without the manufacturers knowing exactly how they produce their effects." (Fukuyama, )
Potentially Worse and More Complicated Negative Side Effects
Most drugs have side effects and are regulated as a result. However, most side effects remain unknown until the drug is actually tested in a large enough population. Drugs have been recalled as a result of their side effects but only after a number of people were affected.
However, with genetic engineering especially, the stakes are higher. The genetic manipulation cannot be 'recalled' and may not be able to be treated since genes are more fundamental and their interactions are likely more complicated and less understood than conventional drugs.
This problem gets worse in the next stage.
Stage 2
The Blurry Line and Negative Externalities
Negative externalities are costs borne by third parties not involved in the transaction that gave rise to the cost. In the case of the family, parents who may even be seeking the best interest of their children may make genetic decisions for their children that may have several types of negative consequences. These negative externalities will be born primarily by the children and may have varying degrees of seriousness.
Given the afore-mentioned 'blurry line' these genetic decisions could start with small increases in memory capacity of the child (similar to Ritalin) but eventually lead to the addition of traits that may be simply be considered favorable in a particular culture at a particular point in time. Such things as "ultrathin girls, pliable boys, or [even] red hair" (as Fukuyama suggests) may change within the culture and from one generation to the next or may even be harmful to the child irrespective of generation or culture.
What makes such decisions particularly harmful is that a child can change his/her ideas or practices but it would be substantially more difficult for him/her to change his/her own genetic make-up or genotype. One can even imagine a situation in which a gene manipulation (although the term 'gene treatment' may eventually be preferred) that results in an unforseen but significant harmful side effect. Let us say for instance that the side effect involves a painful disorder or a signficant succeptibility to a certain virulent disease. These conditions will be suffered by the child and all its descendants. Are they then to suffer and forego children of their own for what could have been a superficial enhancement that their parents chose?
Let the Competition Begin!
Eventually, as genetic engineering becomes widespread enough that differences between the haves and haves-not become noticeable, there will be an increased demand for treatments (i.e. improvements) for children who may be entering a generation of unskilled, skilled, and 'super-skilled' workers. Aside from those parents who may end up warring with their peers to see who can get the better upgrade for the child for their own glory, there may be parents who feel that unless they help (i.e. improve) their children, all of their progeny may be doomed to become members of some genetically inferior underclass.
Even currently, with our competitive job market and consumerist culture, sociologists such as Austin Bunn are saying that we have already gone from parenting to "product development." (NYT Magazine, 2002). Genetic Engineering will simply allow parents to do this more efficiently.
On an even larger scale, consider Japan's somewhat miraculous post-war economic recovery. This economic growth with such limited natural resources was mainly due to its investment in human resources (education) and later, technology. Imagine if a nation, Nation X, were to eventually reach a stage (whether through state laws or the process just described) where its labor force were genetically enhanced to make them more efficient and productive. Nations desiring to become or remain economically strong relative to others would then have a greater incentive to 'improve' their workforces. At this point, governments may not even have to use force but only financial incentives, patriotic calls to their citizens in the interest of the nation's survival, or even just good advertising.
Neo-mercantilists would also see this as a cause for concern since Nation X could invest more money in its military and this would not be favorable for national security (in the realist world, it is capability not intentions that matter).
But why even bother with the economy? Why not just gentically engineer superhuman soldiers? There would, of course, have to be the ability to control such soldiers especially if a large number are, for lack of a better word (or not), created. This could take several different slavish forms, from neurological adjustments to implants all of which would be dehumanizing.
But whether the competition is sociological, economic, political (which includes military), it will likely act as a catalyst towards full-scale, worldwide eugenics, that is, if the number of human casualties from the countless possible genetic mistakes does not stop it first.
Stage 3
Humans? What humans?
If genetic manipulation continues through a prolonged period of time of intense competition, eventually a point will be reached at which the existing species will be so specified that it will be more of a cumulative human creation than it will be human. Members of this new species may have a constant feeling of 'happiness' but have no memories of interpersonal experiences that caused the happiness. Since a person's specifications have become so important, people are valued based on their capabilities and thus only on their utility. Some members may therefore become 'obsolete' before the end of their lifetime, which, by this time, may be very long. But it's 'okay,' they will probably still be 'happy,' because they are hard-wired to be. This species may likely have less interpersonal needs, family may become obsolete or may only exist for structural purposes. Love -that which many would see today as the most powerful aspect of human nature, would not be possible in a utilitarian society such as this. If its members see each other as having only instrumental value without any inherent dignity, then every relationship would be selfish since people would only use each other for utility or instrumental value instead of sacrificing for each other after recognizing each other's innate worth.
In the end, this new non-human species may exist more like robots than humans after we would have inadvertently brought about the extinction of humanity.
