Corporate Accountability SP11: Difference between revisions
(No difference)
| |
Latest revision as of 21:51, 15 November 2011
Economics -> American Capitalism and Social Justice Spring 11
When the choice is between people or profit, the answer should be an easy one. However, for multinational corporations whose ultimate goal is to maximize profit, it is not always so simple. Today, our society is under increasing threat from corporate abuses. This threat has prompted many scholars as well as organizations and campaigns to challenge the issue of Corporate Accountability.
Scholars
Alperovitz
In America Beyond Capitalism: Reclaiming Our Wealth, Our Liberty, And Our Democracy, Gar Alperovitz discusses inequality, insecurity and the lack of opportunity that is evident in The United States current political and economic system. He states that the three historic values of America; liberty, equality and a meaningful democracy are diminishing through the current system of capitalism. Continuing with that the current system is not doing what was initially promised and there is a need for change. Large private corporations have gained such a large amount of power that it is affecting the democratic ideals that should be instilled in society and demoralizing workers. Alperovitz provides various ideas on an alternate system to capitalism and what it would look like. He suggests a system called the “Pluralist Commonwealth” which would have corporations become better members of the community through democratic control over them <ref name="Alperovitz" />. There would be the redistribution of income and assets, providing the community and employees with greater revenue through the assets and also promoting decentralization. Alperovitz states that this can only be achieved through transforming and making the public the owner of large scale wealth and by developing a new culture. He states four key elements in relation to this:
1. New institutions must be developed that hold wealth on behalf of small and large publics
2. Democracy cannot be rebuilt with a big D in the system without the implementation of small d in everyday life; including the economic institutions that sustain stability of local community life
3. There is no way to achieve democracy in a continental scale system without radical decentralization
4. There is no way of achieving meaningful individual liberty without individual economic security and more free time. Which cannot be achieved without a change in ownership of wealth and the income flows it permits. <ref name="Alperovitz" />
He continues with that in order to do this the four key elements must be built on. He builds on the four key elements stating that “Without local democracy, there can be no culture of democratic practice; without security and time, there can be only a weak citizenry; without decentralization, it is difficult to mobilize democratic practice and accountability; and without major and far reaching new forms of wealth holding, there can never be adequate support for the conditions and policies needed to build a more egalitarian and free democratic culture. Finally, the model is based on the judgment that greater equality, greater individual economic security, greater amounts of free time, and-upon this basis-the reconstitution of a culture of common responsibility are ultimately required if we are ever to reorient our community and national priorities in general.” <ref name="Alperovitz" />
More specifically in the chapter where Alperovitz focuses on inequality and giant corporations, he discusses the power that the rich and large corporations are able to obtain. In relation to politics he states that only the wealthy can currently participate in the version of democracy that has developed. Alperovitz in America Beyond Capitalism lists ways large corporations gain control and exploit in the current capitalist system. Large corporations regularly:
1. Influence legislation and agenda setting through lobbying
2. Influence regulatory behavior through direct and indirect pressure
3. Influence elections via large-scale campaign contributions
4. Influence public attitudes through massive media campaigns
5. Influence local government choices through all of the above- and add implicit or explicit threats of withdrawing plants, equipment, and jobs from specific locations
6. Influence choice at all levels by virtue of the simple fact that in the absence of an alternative, the economy as a whole depends on the viability and success of its most important economic actor- a reality that commonly forces citizen and politician alike to respond to corporate demands.<ref name="Alperovitz" />
A response to these activities that some would seek would be government regulation of these actions large corporations participate in. However Alperovitz states that corporations have been able to develop powerful lobbying and other tactics that influence federal agencies and commissions that are developed to oversee their functioning. A powerful force that has been able to countervail the political powers of corporations has been organized labor. Unfortunately however due to the decline in labor union membership there has been a decline in labor unions abilities to restrain corporate influence. Corporate political contributions outnumber labor unions 14 to 1. Further in this chapter of America Beyond Capitalism there are proposed partial solutions for corporate accountability including public disclosure of information, corporations that would receive preferential tax treatment if agreed to a code of conduct. A Social Responsibility Amendment that would require corporations to renew a charter every twenty years and if the corporation could not prove that they serve the common good there assets would be redistributed to another community that could better meet social goals. There is also the suggestion that employee and community members be appointed seats on corporate boards to directly represent the interest of the workers and community. An internal corporate democratization tactic is also provided that would be a system involving a self-governing employee-owned enterprise. The last strategy suggested is a greater institutional change that would have large blocks of stock held by public and private pension funds. These are the strategies that Alperovitz suggests to constrain the power of large corporations as well as his “Pluralist Commonwealth” system.
Domhoff
In the book Who Rules America, Domhoff seeks to prove that the social upper class, the owners of production and high level executives, has the necessary resources and influence to establish policies beneficial to them regardless of organized opposition for the liberal-labor coalition. This theory of upper class domination begins with the corporate community. The corporate community is described as an interlocking network of directors that connects major companies and corporations across the nation. It is primarily made by five organizations: The National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the Conference Board, the Business Council, and the Business Roundtable. There is an overlap between the corporate community and the upper class through upper class social institutions. These institutions provide elite education, leadership training, and a vast network <ref name="Domhoff" />. The upper class and corporate community use what is referred to as their policy-planning network to influence government for policies beneficial to them. This network is comprised of foundations, think tanks, and policy discussion groups, all financed by the corporate community. The upper class, the corporate community, and the policy-planning network are collectively referred to as the power elite. There is then an opinion-shaping network that works to perpetuate the individualistic and anti governmental beliefs of the American value system and to influence the public’s opinion on specific issues. At the core of this network are large public relations firms and public affairs departments. There organizations are connected to a much larger network of hundreds of smaller organizations that includes special committees to influence single issues, corporate financed advertising councils, local advertising agencies, and the mass media. Since this network’s influence is extremely diverse and widespread, it has many points of contact and a large influence over the general public.<ref name="Domhoff" />
Due to the single member district plurality system and the election of a president, the U.S. has evolved into a two party system. This system has lead to a divide between politics and policy. The liberal-labor coalition was never able to form a party of its own. The power elite controls the two primary parties. This has lead to the worst tendencies of a two party system: avoidance of issues, collusion, and emphasis on the character of candidates. Personality and social issues have become the main concern of the public in electing a president; not their stances on policies related to jobs and health. Campaign donations also play a major role in the power elite’s influence over government policies. Corporations are able to donate large sums of money to political campaigns through Political Action Committees <ref name="Domhoff" />.
Through the policy-planning network, the opinion shaping process, and their financial resources the power elite are able to dominate the political arena in the U.S. The two party system and the inability of the liberal-labor coalition to form its own party furthered this control by the elite. This can be clearly scene by examining the backgrounds of government officials. Nearly all are members of the power elite <ref name="Domhoff" />.
Yates
In his book Why Unions Matter, Michael Yates uses simple terms to answer basic questions about the function and formation of unions, the process of collective bargaining, and the relationship between unions and American politics. He begins by explaining that unions provide solidarity and allow worker’s demands to be met as a group when they would have likely been ignored otherwise. This solidarity provides not only a wage advantage but also enhanced grievance procedures, benefits, and dignity for the American worker. <ref name="Yates"> Yates, Michael D. (2009). Why Unions Matter. New York, NY: Monthly Review Press. </ref>
Yates also addresses the allegation of the corrupt nature of unions by saying that although there have been cases of illegal activities, generally unions leaders are elected by their members and accountable to them. He argues that this model of democracy marks the vast contrast to the lack of democracy of corporations. <ref name="Yates" />
In the last chapter, Yates identifies that the core of the labor agenda are the right to employment, the democratic control of production, more leisure time, reduced income gap, and an end to discrimination in the workplace. <ref name="Yates" /> He also suggests that even though some of these elements are included in the Democratic agenda, the labor movement might need more sympathetic allies from the Labor Party, which is currently weak and has no chance of winning an election. <ref name="Yates" /> Yates’ idea of labor movement reform calls for significant support from a stronger political party to fight for the rights of American workers.
Bowles, Edwards, and Roosevelt
In Understanding Capitalism, the authors depict that economic systems should be evaluated on the based on the ability of the economic activities to provide participants with the opportunities to lead flourishing lives. The most important aspects of judging an economy are its efficiency, its fairness, and the degree to which it is democratic.
Efficiency: A labor process is deemed efficient if “the effort, time, intelligence, creativity, raw materials, natural environment, information, and machinery used in it are applied in a way that enhances people’s well-being by equipping them with the things and the free time needed to lead a flourishing life" <ref name="BER" />. Basically, that the labor and inputs in an economy are used well and not wasted. Often overlooked in economies are the destruction of the natural environment and the abuse of labor effort.
Fairness: This refers to the distribution of burden and benefits. “Burden refers to sacrifices necessary to produce goods and services; benefit refers primarily to the use of what is produced”<ref name="BER" />. An economy is considered fair if the burden and benefits are distributed equitably. However, this refers to the view that everyone should have an equal opportunity to lead a successful life. This does not mean that everyone should experience equal outcomes. Determining the fairness of an economic system is a very controversial topic, and thus is difficult to achieve.
Democracy: “This criterion questions the extent to which the economic system promotes(or hinders) democratic functioning of the government" <ref name="BER"/>. They break democracy down into three main characteristics: accountability of power, respect for civil liberties and other guarantees of individual choice, and equal opportunity for effective political participation.
Challenging Walmart
Major Challengers
Walmart Watch
Walmart Watch (WW) was formed in the spring of 2005 as a joint project of Five Stones and the Center for Community and Corporate Ethics to criticize Walmart’s corporate accountability as the largest corporation in the United States. [1]
Since its establishment, WW has represented hundreds of thousands of Walmart employees countrywide. Through in-depth research and analysis, WW has been educating policy makers, community leaders, media, and the public about Walmart’s wages, benefits and impact on communities.
In November 2005, WW kicked off a series of events called “Higher Expectations Week”. Supported by over 300 organizations, this nationwide campaign included more than 1000 local events and 7000 house parties to advocate for stronger efforts by federal, state, and local officials to hold Walmart to their standard of “high expectations.” .<ref name="walmartwatch">Higher Expectations Week, additional text.</ref>
WW has also performed a “Price Check” program to test Walmart’s low-price guarantee policy. There has been a lot of speculation about Walmart’s pricing strategy and how they usually cut prices upon moving into a new community only to raise them when free of nearby competition. For this nationwide project, WW chose 5 everyday household products for testers to purchase and compare prices across the country. [2]
By shining a spotlight on some of Walmart’s shortcomings, WW hopes to challenge the giant corporation to become a more responsible corporate citizen and a positive force for change for millions of American workers.
Wake Up Walmart
Wake Up Walmart (WUW) is a community-based campaign launched by the United Food and Commercial Workers Union in 2005 to be the center of a new grassroots movement that will lead and revolutionize the national fight to change Walmart [3]
Paul Blank, campaign director for the WUW campaign, stated: "Walmart's greed puts profits before people… we are forming a grassroots movement to empower millions of Americans to ask Walmart to put people first… There is only one force powerful enough to change the largest corporation in the world, the largest retailer in the world and the largest employer in the world-the American people. We are Walmart's consumers and it is time for Walmart to wake up and start doing what is right for its employees, our families, and our country." [4]
The WUW campaign aim to give retail workers necessary tools to band together in common purpose in order to change their employers’ business practices. The campaign utilizes an array of organizing strategies, innovative media, a blog and other internet tools that have been used successfully in previous political and grassroots campaigns. [5]
The campaign website informs people about Walmart’s record and invites visitors to become active members. The "Take Action" feature also allows community leaders to Adopt-A-Store and begins forming community coalitions around every Walmart location in the United States. The website is also used to form a group of current and former Walmart employees called the Walmart Veterans Association where Walmart stories can be shared. In addition, the campaign carries a resourceful blog that is updated throughout the day on news and stories related to Walmart.
In 2005, WUW also created a national association called Walmart Workers of America to advise past and present Walmart workers of their rights and help them to file complaints against Walmart. <ref name="Washington Post">Group to Form Association for Walmart Workers, additional text.</ref>
Overlapping Ideologies
Alperovitz
In his popular book America Beyond Capitalism, Gar Alperovitz defines the distribution of wealth ownership in America as truly feudal and deeply corrosive of our democracy. Data shows that the top 5% of Americans own about 70% of all financial wealth. Furthermore, the top 1% of Americans now claim more income per year than the bottom 100 million Americans taken together. <ref name="Alperovitz"> Alperovitz, Gar. America Beyond Capitalism: Reclaiming Our Wealth Our Liberty, and Our Democracy. John Wiley & Sons, Inc:New Jersey, 2005 </ref>
Alperovitz clearly expresses that our society is in a lot of trouble: escalating inequality, erosion of liberties, and growing pessimism about the democratic system. The current system simply cannot deliver its promises, and neither will traditional liberal solutions. He sketches the outlines of a new system that can sustain equality, liberty, and democracy in the coming century. This system is Pluralist Commonwealth, which literally calls for a diversity of democratic institutional forms and a centrality of public wealth holding. <ref name="Alperovitz" />
Both WW and WUW would agree with Alperovitz that giant corporations such as Walmart are to take the blame for the growing concentration of wealth and the decay of liberty, fairness, and democracy in our society. The efforts of their initiatives to push Walmart to restructure their wages, bonus, and benefits can help redistribute wealth and income in America. Therefore, they would strongly support Alperovitz’s idea of a Pluralist Commonwealth system where corporate control of capital would be replaced with new institutions of property ownership. They all share the vision that, eventually, worker-owned and community-owned businesses and a national public trust will come to hold public wealth on behalf of the working class communities.
WW and WUW also fight for retail workers to have more leisure time, because according to Alperovitz, “…there is no way to achieve a meaningful individual liberty in the modern era without individual economic security and greater amounts of free time.” <ref name="Alperovitz" />
One other ideal of Alperovitz that is shared by WW and WUW is that democracy must start from nurturing local democracy in everyday life in local communities. These groups collaborate in nationwide projects that often start with local churches and house parties, aiming to educate the public from the local level.
Only when the economy shifts from corporate control to public control can other changes follow to bring liberty, fairness, and democracy to the American workforce.
Domhoff
In Who Rules America, G. William Domhoff introduces his interpretation of class and how power is structured in the United States. In concluding the first chapter, Domhoff states that that the social upper class is an economic class based on the fact that members of the upper class are usually also owners of wealth. <ref name="Domhoff"> Domhoff, G. William. Who Rules America?: Challenges to Corporate and Class Dominance. 6th Ed. McGraw-Hill: University of California, Santa Cruz, 2010 </ref>
WW and WUW would agree with Domhoff’s statement that unequal distribution of wealth is the reason for separation of economic classes in America. Therefore, by fighting to reduce the income gap, these groups are essentially trying to challenge the domination of the “power elite” groups such as Walmart and its business partners.
Domhoff devotes chapter 4 of his book to demonstrate the role of the network of foundations, think tanks and policy discussion groups that are supported by the corporate community. <ref name="Domhoff" /> These organizations perform policy research and make recommendations to policy makers, thus indirectly involving corporate leaders in the policy-making process. WW and WUW, through providing research to educate the public, the media, and policy makers, have the same mission, but instead of the corporate leaders, they are engaging the American workforce in the process of decision making.
Yates
In his new edition of Why Unions Matter, Michael D. Yates shows why unions still matter in America. Unions strive for better wages, benefits, and working conditions for their members; they force employers to treat employees with dignity and respect; and they provide a way for workers to make society more democratic <ref name="Yates" />.
According to the definition of unions by Yates, WW and WUW both function very similarly to a labor union. Though they do not usually directly negotiate with Walmart, they provide research and organize campaigns to push Walmart to more fully embract its corporate responsibilities. Similarly to unions, WW and WUW build strength in numbers and utilize “collective bargaining,” which allows hope for a positively dramatic for labor workers across the country.
Bowles, Edwards, and Roosevelt
According to Bowles, Edwards, and Roosevelt (BER), an economic system must be judged using 3 criteria: efficiency, fairness, and democracy. <ref name="BER"> Bowles, Samuel, Richard Edwards, and Frank Roosevelt. Understanding Capitalism: Competition, Command and Change. 3rd Ed. New York: Oxford UP, 2005 </ref>
- Efficiency means getting the most human satisfaction with the least use of material resources. The efficiency of labor refers to the level of output can be produced at a certain level of work effort. <ref name="BER" /> Though WW and WUW do not directly address the shortcomings of efficiency under capitalism, they seek to improve the overall human satisfaction of workers by improving wages, benefits, working conditions, and leisure time. This increase in human satisfaction will result in a slight decline in benefits for the corporate leaders that they will have to accept.
- Fairness typically means equality of opportunity and benefits. Capitalism’s avoidance of fairness is a major fault. In the capitalist systems, corporations such as Walmart own the majority of wealth and have major influence over political and economic institutions. Besides working to improve wealth for workers, WW and WUW provide education for policy makers in hope that the government would be more balanced in terms of which side the policies favor.
- Democracy is also an important value that is represented by equality of access to participation in social decisions. BER defines a democratic firm as one that is “owned by its employees and run by people who are elected by the employees.” <ref name="BER" /> Using this framework, Walmart falls short because its employees have very little power over the production and distribution process as well as their wages and benefits.
Social Justice
Social Justice is concerned with equal justice in all aspects of the society: the creation of just relationships at all levels of society; the development of structures that provide equal opportunities; the facilitation of access to basic needs such as information, services and resources; and finally the engagement in decision-making for all people. WW and WUW are organizations that function on the basis of social justice. Their initiatives strive to reduce the income gap between Walmart workers and their employers as well as to improve working conditions. These projects can eradicate class discrimination which creates a more level playing field where all workers have equal opportunities and access to information and resources, while at the same time engaging themselves in the making of corporate and social decisions.
Multinational Monitor & Corporate Ethics International
Multinational Monitor
Multinational Monitor is a group that provides information on large corporations and their performances. The group develops information on large corporations through interviews and intellectual articles. These documents discuss the problems that large industries are causing or have caused and what should be or should have been done to prevent the problems. Multinational Monitor provides information on how corporations are too large and the need for these firms to be split up in order to prevent the “too big to fail” problem from occurring. Along with the discussion of unions and the exploitation that brokers use of clients. The goal of this corporation is to make people aware of the problems that large corporations are creating. While also providing ways in which these corporations could be used for the benefit of the community if changed to a more social just way of operating. Additionally incorporating ways problems with large corporations could have been prevented or lessoned the impact [6].
Corporate Ethics International
Corporate Ethics International’s mission is to bring corporations under control and in service to the citizenry. They believe that a strong corporate campaign NGO community is necessary to achieve their mission which is why they place themselves in the center of it. Their beliefs are that corporations have gained power and rights that were not intended for them and that they have used these rights to dismantle our democracy into a corporatocracy. Through using their power and wealth they have influenced which government officials are elected and how they govern for the betterment of themselves instead of society. Corporate Ethics international has developed a strategic corporate initiative that charts the next 20 years to insure that they stay on course of bringing control of corporations back under citizenry. There is also the Business Ethics Network which is built to increase the capacity of the corporation campaign through educating, networking, developing collaborative opportunities, staff training and fundraising. Corporate Ethics International also has large campaigns that focus on specific industries that they feel could change the way corporations do business. A major campaign is the Big Box Campaign which focuses on certain manufactured goods and is playing a large role in affecting Wal-Mart from gaining complete control over certain manufactured products. Their other major campaign is the Tar Sands Campaign which is a move towards clean and sustainable energy economy through slowing the expansion of tar sands [7].
Overlapping Ideologies
Alperovitz
Multinational Monitor and Corporate Ethics International both agree with the ideas that Alperovitz states in America Beyond Capitalism. Both groups feel that corporations have become too large and gained excessive control in society. Alperovitz would be in agreement with much of the interviews and articles that are presented on Multinational Monitor in explaining the problems with large corporations. Specifically the decentralizing of the power that corporations have, for the betterment of communities for example the article about Citi Group. As for Corporate Ethics International this group’s view on large corporations goes hand in hand with Alperovitz. In that they feel corporations should be put back in control of the citizenry and used for the betterment of society not just a select few. Also the awareness of the group that corporations have used the power and wealth to affect the election of government officials and the way they govern. The views of Corporate Ethics International appear to be a basis off of the Alperovitz system of “Pluralist Commonwealth.”
Domhoff
G. William Domhoff, in Who Rules America presents various issues with corporate and class dominance. His way of providing information although in more detail through his book is similar to the way Multinational Monitor provides information for people on the issues of inequality and power. Domhoff states that the social upper class is an economic class made of owners of large corporations <ref name="Domhoff" />. In which these owners are able to splurge and buy luxuries when the lower class is struggling to feed themselves and obtain healthcare. This point that Domhoff makes is a reason why Multinational Monitor and Corporate Ethics International have their mission at hand. There is an article in Multinational Monitor which discusses the rough recessionary times for two yacht corporations but goes onto discuss the reason the wealthy aren’t spending is because of “luxury shame” and they feel bad spending their money on luxuries during rough times for others [8]. This goes to show how while others are losing their jobs and have no income the wealthy are choosing to sit on their money instead of helping. Which is why Corporate Ethics International, is fighting for the citizenry control over corporations in order to bring more revenue to communities, not a select group. Another area that Domhoff discusses is the think tanks that corporations higher to provide protection from any problems and find ways to continually allow them to exploit workers and communities. This is an aspect of Corporate Ethics International’s mission to prevent this corporatocracy and bring back democracy, to prevent corporations from manipulating the system for their own benefit.
Yates
Michael D. Yates in Why Unions Matter discusses the impact that unions can have and the benefits they can bring for workers. The Multinational Monitor follows different unions and the problems they face to inform the public about the situations and make them aware of what unions can do and how the workers get exploited by large corporations. Specifically there is an interview with Jerry Tucker a former board member of the United Auto Workers Union. This interview provides information about the bankruptcy of GM and Chrysler expressing what went on and future movement by these auto industry corporations. It also discusses the ideas that the United Auto Workers Union had, to try and help the corporations in order to create a more competitive project. Multinational Monitor knows just like Yates that unions are important which is why they provide information on them and make the public aware. As for Corporate Ethics International the way they create campaigns and join together with other organizations is similar to unions. This NGO corporate campaign committee knows that they are stronger as a collective group and can have a greater impact on changing the corporate world for the betterment of the community. This is why they act similar to a union in agreement with Yates that as a collective group with the same goals, agreements and changes can be reached.
Bowles, Edwards, and Roosevelt
Bowles, Edwards and Roosevelt believe efficiency, fairness and democracy are the three criteria necessary to judge an economic system<ref name="BER" />. Corporate Ethics International’s mission does not put as much focus on efficiency however their mission has a strong emphasis on fairness and democracy. Through striving for a system where corporations are put back into control of the citizenry it creates a system of equal opportunity for all. This allows for all to benefit from the corporations and create a more pleasant community. Corporate Ethics International is also fighting for a community that is a democracy and will involve participation of all individuals in the choice of government officials. Therefore not allowing the wealthy to decide who is elected through funding and the way the government official govern the country, state and local governments. These are the goals of the group however it will take time and it is a hard task ahead to accomplish the criteria that Bowles, Edwards and Roosevelt feel makes a good economic system. Multinational Monitor provides articles and interviews that show how these three aspects are not present in the current system in order to make the public aware and create an impulse for people to change this. However it will take a more active group to obtain these three criteria and change the current economic system.
Social Justice
Multinational Monitor and Corporate Ethics International both operate on a level that is socially just. Multinational Monitor is operating to inform people of the injustices and imbalances in the world. To show people that the events occurring are affecting the equality of our society. The group is providing the access to information that the public needs to understand the socially unjust actions that are occurring. As for Corporate Ethics International they are acting in a more active, socially just form. Through creating campaigns and collaborative opportunities to fight against the corporations and create a more socially just world. Their mission is based off of social justice in trying to achieve equal justice in all aspects of society for the betterment of the community.
Fighting for Corporate Accountability
Major Organizations
Corporate Accountability International
Corporate Accountability International is a non-profit organization dedicated to protecting human rights from corporate abuse. It was established in 1977 and since its founding has been successful in exposing corporate injustices and limiting corporate power. Its vision is “the air we breathe, the water we drink and our very democracy are under increasing threat from corporate abuses. We are working toward a world where major decisions affecting people and the environment are based on the public interest, not on maximizing corporate profits” [9].
Corporate Accountability International was founded during the movement to demand direct corporate accountability to public interests and has been one of the forefront of the movement ever since. Some of its major successes against corporations include the Infant Formula Campaign and the Nestlé Boycott that brought about significant reforms in the life-threatening marketing of infant formula in poor countries. Also, their Nuclear weapon maker’s campaign and GE boycott that helped stop General Electric from entering the production of nuclear weapons. Corporate Accountability International is still in the fight to challenge corporate accountability through the use of various campaigns and tactics. These are their current campaigns against corporate injustice:
- Challenging the corporate control of water: the prominent campaign in this is Think Outside the Bottle. In the past few decades, corporations have manufactured demand for bottled water by eroding the public’s confidence in tap water. Bottled water is far less regulated than tap water and the plastic bottles used have been proven to contain harmful chemicals and contribute to a huge amount of pollution to the natural environment. This campaign works to promote and ensure funding for public water systems while protecting against corporate privatization of water.
- Challenging Big Tobacco: this campaign fights to protect the Global Tobacco Treaty and to push for its adoption in new countries. The Global Tobacco Treaty is the world’s first public health and corporate accountability treaty. It bans the marketing of tobacco, prevents tobacco corporations from interfering in public health policy, and gives governments rights to prioritize the health of citizens over trade and commercial interests. It also sets precedents for international regulation of other industries that are detrimental to health, the environment, and human rights.
- Challenging corporate abuse of our food: This campaign fights to hold corporations, primarily fast food corporations, accountable for a range of abuses that are causing diet-related diseases as well as other health problems globally. Through aggressive marketing to children, fast food corporations such as McDonalds hook children at young ages. These corporations also fight against putting nutrition labels on their products. They also work to manipulate the political process to make their highly mal-nutritious available everywhere.
By fighting for direct accountability for corporations’ actions, Corporate Accountability International helps to protect human rights, democracy, and the natural environment.
CorpWatch
CorpWatch is a non-profit organization that is a project of the Tides Center and an affiliate member of Friends of the Earth International. It is devoted to informing the public of corporate malfeasance and advocating for the accountability and transparency of multinational corporations. Its vision is “to promote human, environmental, social and worker rights at the local, national and global levels by making corporate practices more transparent and holding corporations accountable for their actions”[10].
CorpWatch believes the power and influence of corporations has grown far too great. Their power overtakes the democratic process and in some places is even able to control the government. CorpWatch also highlights the fact that corporations have no incentive to act in the interest in the general public. They seek to maximize profits by using whatever means are necessary without being held accountable for the negative impacts of their actions on the people and the planet.
CorpWatch has experienced a number of successes in bringing light to corporate injustices worldwide. Its first major strike to corporations came in 1997 when it exposed the working conditions in Nike factories in Vietnam. This ultimately led to an improvement in working conditions in said factories and an improvement in Nike’s corporate practices. It also organized the Climate Justice Initiative, which has redefined climate change as an environmental justice and human rights issue. It has helped organize and create movements in communities impacted by the fossil fuel industry.
By exposing “multinational corporations that profit from war, fraud, environmental, human rights and other abuses, and providing critical information, CorpWatch fosters a more informed public and an effective democracy” [11].
Overlapping Ideologies
Alperovitz
In America Beyond Capitalism, Alperovitz discusses how the historic values of America; liberty, equality, and a meaningful democracy, are being destroyed by capitalism<ref name="Alperovitz" />. He outlines a new system, called the Pluralist Commonwealth, which he believes will help restore the central values of America. It involves local democracy, security and time, decentralization, and new, far-reaching forms of wealth holding. I believe these organizations would support the new system the Alperovitz discusses. These organizations support a greater distribution of wealth in the population. Both heavily advocate for an increase in local democracy. Corporate Accountability International provides people with campaigns and resources necessary to become successful participants in democracy. CorpWatch provides the public with critical information necessary to participate in democracy. By changing the owners of production to the hands of the public, the values central to American democracy will be able to flourish.
Domhoff
The goals of Corporate Accountability International and CorpWatch mesh with the ideas of Domhoff. In Who Rules America, Domhoff seeks to expose the way in which the social upper class, comprised mainly of the owners of production and executives, holds the power to establish policies favorable to them despite challenges from the liberal-labor coalition. These organizations attempt to limit the power and influence corporations have over decision-making on policies worldwide. CorpWatch has released numerous reports detailing accounts of these attempts at unfair influence on policies. The most notable of these was the UN Global Compact. This was a story written in 1999, detailing the United Nations growing relationships with corporations.
Corporate Accountability International released a document entitled the Standards of Political Conduct for Corporations. This document outlines their vision of a healthy political arena and encompasses the policies necessary to achieve it. The document states that corporations must fully disclose all lobbying activities. This would make the political agendas of corporations more transparent. The document also demands corporations to stop buying or trading favors with government officials, whether they are local or international, in order to end government corruption. It also calls for the end of financial contributions to political campaigns. This would go a long way to prevent corporate influence on politics because elected officials would no longer feel the pressure to bend to the will of the corporations that donated to their campaign for office. It also places safeguards on corporations’ abilities to interfere with policies affecting human rights, health, or the environment. The influence of corporations on these policies is extremely unethical and detrimental to social justice.
If these reforms were put into place it would severely limit the power of the upper class to influence politics. This would provide the separation of corporations and government needed for an effective democracy. This separation would help address much of the problems Domhoff describes with the relationship between government and corporations. Unfortunately, these reforms don’t address the shortcomings that arise from our current two-party system.
Yates
Corporate Accountability International and CorpWatch both agree Yates in terms of the values of the labor agenda. These core values are the right to employment, the democratic control of production, more leisure time, a reduced income gap, and an end to discrimination in the workplace <ref name="Yates" />. CorpWatch specifically sites the exploitation of the labor force that has become a common part of business. They believe business has become a war between employers and employees, each fighting for opposing things. They are particularly concerned with labor issues surrounding unions, outsourcing, health insurance, and pensions.
These organizations agree that the control of production needs to be more democratic and that the income gap has become an enormous issue. Corporations have no incentive to act to benefit the public, only to maximize their own profits and to please their shareholders. This causes them to pull the most production and effort possible out of their workers while minimizing their benefits and pensions. There is no room in the corporate equation for profit for human rights. If the control of production was more democratic, it would greatly expand worker rights.
Bowles, Edwards, and Roosevelt
In Understanding Capitalism, Bowles, Edwards, and Roosevelt believe the most important factors in assessing an economy are efficiency, fairness, and the degree to which it is democratic <ref name="BER" />.
- Efficiency: As mentioned above, the destruction of the natural environment and the abuse of labor effort are often overlooked when evaluating the success of an economy. These groups have worked to expose and organize against corporate abuses of labor and the environment within our borders as well as internationally. By doing this, they have forced the corporations to adjust their practices to limit their negative impacts on worker rights and the natural environment, increasing the efficiency in the world’s economies.
- Fairness: This measures the distribution of benefits and burdens in an economy. Both of these organizations hold human rights and equality of opportunity as some of their most central values. Their fight to hold corporations accountable for their actions helped narrow the gap between those who receive benefits and those who hold most of the burden in the economy.
- Democracy: These organizations go a long way to promote democracy in economies. They recognize that the power of corporations has grown great enough to heavily influence the democratic process. They force corporations to be held somewhat accountable for the negative impacts of their decisions. They fight against violations of civil liberties by informing the public and organizing campaigns and social movements. Lastly, they strive to limit corporations’ ability to control democratic practice by providing the public with resources necessary to be effective participants in the decision making process.
Through their impressive efforts, these organizations have helped increase the ability for economies to provide their participants with equal opportunities and the resources necessary to lead flourishing lives.
Social Justice
Social justice is defined as the creation of just relationships at all system levels, the development of structures that provide for equality of opportunity, the facilitation of access to needed information, services and resources, and the support of meaningful participation in decision-making for all people. Although the organizations I’ve discussed may not play a role in all aspects of this definition, they strive to promote social justice and support all social justice movements regardless of their ability to participate in them. Both organizations discussed here are leaders in informing the public on issues critical to their health, their rights, and their natural environment. They also provide resources that encourage individuals to get involved in social activism. Lastly, they fight for democracy and the right for meaningful decisions affecting the public to be made by the people and not by corporations.
References
<references/> Walmart Watch's Website
Multinational Monitor's Website.
Corporate Ethics International's Website.
