Alvarado2007: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alvaradr (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
R. C. Alvarado
R. C. Alvarado


Academic Technology Lunch 'n' Learn Series
Academic Technology ''Lunch 'n' Learn'' Series


Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
[[Alvarado2007_Exhibits|EXHIBITS]]


= Introduction =
= Introduction =
== Weclome ==
* Welcome
== Thank yous and introductions ==
* Thank yous and introductions
== About this series ==
== About this series ==
== Purpose ==
* Purpose
== Content ==
* Content
== Today's material ==
 
== Segue to today's topic ==
* Begin with the less familiar
* Provide some framing ideas
 
= What is digital text? =
 
== Three Kinds of work ==
* Digital text is highly variable -- PDFs, Word, Web Pages, Blog entries, Wiki pages, Databases, XML, etc.
* Its forms are a function of its contexts of its use
* In academia, these are three: (1) Publishing, (2) Teaching, and (3) Research:


= What do we mean by digital text? =
== 3 Kinds of work ==
=== Digital Publishing ===
=== Digital Publishing ===
* A lot of work has been done at Dickinson in this area
** James Gerencser and John Osborne's DEILA projects
=== Instructional Technology ===
=== Instructional Technology ===
* ATS, in particular Todd Bryant, has spear-headed a lot of work in this area
** The Dickinson Blog and Dickinson Wiki
=== Digital Scholarship ===
=== Digital Scholarship ===
* Includes Humanities computing and e-science
* Includes Humanities computing and e-science
* Less developed on campus
* My area of interest, and what I want to focus on
== "Textualities" ==
* AKA "Discourse Genres"
* Form, Content, Practice
=== Mark-up ===
[[Image:Sick-rose-xml.png|thumb]] 
* Think of this as close-reading, text-criticism
* A methodology that merges the (old) New Criticism with the discourse analysis of the socio-linguist with the Qualitative Data Analysis of the sociologist
* EXAMPLES
** TEI
** XML in general
** Grizzard
=== Collaboration ===
* Wikis and Blogs
=== Linking ===
* An overlaying dimension to the previous technologies
* Text as Database → from Sequence to Random Access
* Has the most profound and difficult to control effects:
** Challenges the the notion of the text itself
** Narrative
* EXAMPLES
** [[http://www.ontoligent.com/acta/ovid/v5 Ovid]]
** [[http://www.princeton.edu/~lancelot '''Figura''']]
= Why work with digital text? =  
= Why work with digital text? =  
== Mediations ==  
== Technology breaks things ==
= Conclusion =
* Describe the principle
= IDEAS =
* Opportunities for teaching
* Obligations for engagement
=== Structure, layout, content ===
=== Authorship ===
=== Boundaries ===
=== Flow ===
=== Medium ===
 
== "The times, they are a' changin' ==
* The changes are happening now
* The macro forces are beyond are control
** Economics will drive the move to e-books
** The Googlefication of Everything
== Mediations ==
=== Research and Teaching ===
* Collections-based teaching possible
=== Research and Publishing ===
* New models of publishing
* New engagements with audiences
=== Remarks ===
* Research mediates between Teaching and the two other areas of academic work
* Technology mediates between both Research and Teaching, and Research and Publishing
 
= Conclusion =
* Scholars have the opportunity to shape practice and discourse genres by ''working the technology''
** AKA hacking, bricolage
* The point is not to give you ready made examples of examples of how to teach with digital text, complete with rubrics, outcomes, and best practices
* The point is not to give you ready made examples of examples of how to teach with digital text, complete with rubrics, outcomes, and best practices
* Rather, it is to engage you in your historical role as producers not only of knowledge but of '''knowledge practice'''
* Rather, it is to engage you in your historical role as producers not only of knowledge but of '''knowledge practice'''
* From theory to method . . .
= ALTERNATE =
== Frame the discussion ==
=== Three Kinds of E-Text Work ===
== Technology Breaks Things ==
* Discuss the rationalization effect
* Opportunity for teaching
* Obligation for academics
== Seven Types of Ambiguity ==
* Insert the kinds of textuality under the kind of ambiguity
=== Fixity and Boundedness ===
* Wiki
* Hypertext
* Databases
=== Form/Content/Layout ===
=== Flow ===
* Hypertext
* Databases
=== Media ===
=== Authorship ===
* Wikis
=== Publishing and Prestige ===
* A problem -- new forms of peer review will emerge
* By definition, can't be a "wisdom of the crowd model"
* Focus on public role of the scholar and scientist
=== Teaching and Research ===
== Conclusion ==

Latest revision as of 01:58, 30 October 2007

Teaching with Digital Text

R. C. Alvarado

Academic Technology Lunch 'n' Learn Series

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

EXHIBITS

Introduction

  • Welcome
  • Thank yous and introductions

About this series

  • Purpose
  • Content

Segue to today's topic

  • Begin with the less familiar
  • Provide some framing ideas

What is digital text?

Three Kinds of work

  • Digital text is highly variable -- PDFs, Word, Web Pages, Blog entries, Wiki pages, Databases, XML, etc.
  • Its forms are a function of its contexts of its use
  • In academia, these are three: (1) Publishing, (2) Teaching, and (3) Research:

Digital Publishing

  • A lot of work has been done at Dickinson in this area
    • James Gerencser and John Osborne's DEILA projects

Instructional Technology

  • ATS, in particular Todd Bryant, has spear-headed a lot of work in this area
    • The Dickinson Blog and Dickinson Wiki

Digital Scholarship

  • Includes Humanities computing and e-science
  • Less developed on campus
  • My area of interest, and what I want to focus on

"Textualities"

  • AKA "Discourse Genres"
  • Form, Content, Practice

Mark-up

  • Think of this as close-reading, text-criticism
  • A methodology that merges the (old) New Criticism with the discourse analysis of the socio-linguist with the Qualitative Data Analysis of the sociologist
  • EXAMPLES
    • TEI
    • XML in general
    • Grizzard

Collaboration

  • Wikis and Blogs

Linking

  • An overlaying dimension to the previous technologies
  • Text as Database → from Sequence to Random Access
  • Has the most profound and difficult to control effects:
    • Challenges the the notion of the text itself
    • Narrative
  • EXAMPLES

Why work with digital text?

Technology breaks things

  • Describe the principle
  • Opportunities for teaching
  • Obligations for engagement

Structure, layout, content

Authorship

Boundaries

Flow

Medium

"The times, they are a' changin'

  • The changes are happening now
  • The macro forces are beyond are control
    • Economics will drive the move to e-books
    • The Googlefication of Everything

Mediations

Research and Teaching

  • Collections-based teaching possible

Research and Publishing

  • New models of publishing
  • New engagements with audiences

Remarks

  • Research mediates between Teaching and the two other areas of academic work
  • Technology mediates between both Research and Teaching, and Research and Publishing

Conclusion

  • Scholars have the opportunity to shape practice and discourse genres by working the technology
    • AKA hacking, bricolage
  • The point is not to give you ready made examples of examples of how to teach with digital text, complete with rubrics, outcomes, and best practices
  • Rather, it is to engage you in your historical role as producers not only of knowledge but of knowledge practice
  • From theory to method . . .

ALTERNATE

Frame the discussion

Three Kinds of E-Text Work

Technology Breaks Things

  • Discuss the rationalization effect
  • Opportunity for teaching
  • Obligation for academics

Seven Types of Ambiguity

  • Insert the kinds of textuality under the kind of ambiguity

Fixity and Boundedness

  • Wiki
  • Hypertext
  • Databases

Form/Content/Layout

Flow

  • Hypertext
  • Databases

Media

Authorship

  • Wikis

Publishing and Prestige

  • A problem -- new forms of peer review will emerge
  • By definition, can't be a "wisdom of the crowd model"
  • Focus on public role of the scholar and scientist

Teaching and Research

Conclusion