History of Happiness Studies: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Happiness (talk | contribs)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 16: Line 16:
In the early 1900s, economics was further challenged by the English economist, Lionel Robbins. He disagreed with traditional economics, and felt that the economy should take its impacts on people into deeper consideration, moving more towards the personal focus. In 1932, he published ''Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science'', and argued that it is not necessary to know or compare a person's level of happiness in order to predict his or her behavior. Economics, to Robbins, is about "the relationship between given ends and scarce means". This helped lead to the development of "positive economics".
In the early 1900s, economics was further challenged by the English economist, Lionel Robbins. He disagreed with traditional economics, and felt that the economy should take its impacts on people into deeper consideration, moving more towards the personal focus. In 1932, he published ''Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science'', and argued that it is not necessary to know or compare a person's level of happiness in order to predict his or her behavior. Economics, to Robbins, is about "the relationship between given ends and scarce means". This helped lead to the development of "positive economics".


Robbins himself did not focus so much on the importance of happiness in public policy. However, his followers did attempt to create an index for happiness. Their equation roughly equaled GDP adjusted for pollution and leisure, and still placed great importance on income. This and later-developed indexes helped to form a tool for public policy makers when looking at happiness.
Robbins himself did not focus so much on the importance of happiness in public policy. However, two of his followers, Hicks and Kaldor, did attempt to create an index for happiness. Their equation roughly equaled GDP adjusted for pollution and leisure, and still placed great importance on income. From this, a number of different measurements have been developed to measure happiness, such as the Gross National Happiness Index. The first GNH index was developed by the King of Bhutan, and has been adopted by Thailand. Australia, Canada, China, and the United Kingdom are currently coming up with their own indexes.
These indexes have helped to form a tool for public policy makers when looking at happiness.


'''The Kaldor Compensation Criteria:'''
'''The Kaldor Compensation Criteria:'''


<p align="right">[[Image:Kaldor compensation criteria.gif]]</p>
[[Image:Kaldor compensation criteria.gif]]</p>


==Richard Layard==
==Richard Layard==
Born as Peter Richard Grenville Layard, this British economist has been one of, if not the most, influential individuals in the development of happiness studies.
<p align="right">[[Image:Richard layard.jpg]]</p>  
<p align="right">[[Image:Richard layard.jpg]]</p>  
Born Peter Richard Grenville Layard, this British economist has been one of, if not the most, influential individuals in the development of happiness studies.


===Life===
===Life===
Line 33: Line 34:


In 2000, Layard became a Labour Life Peer in the House of Lords, gaining the title of Baron Layard of Highgate, London Borough of Haringey.
In 2000, Layard became a Labour Life Peer in the House of Lords, gaining the title of Baron Layard of Highgate, London Borough of Haringey.
'''Awards'''
*Fellow of Econometric Society
*Fellow of British Academy
*Hon. D. Soc. Sci., Brunel University




===Work===
===Work===


Richard Layard has developed his reputation through his work with labor economics. Labor economics advocates the idea of "welfare-to-work" policies, where social welfare payments encourage/force recipients back into the job market. From 1997 to 2001, Layard was a consultant to the Labour government, and he continues to support many of the economic policies of the New Labour government in the U.K.
Richard Layard has developed his reputation through his work with labor economics. Labor economics advocates the idea of "welfare-to-work" policies, where social welfare payments encourage/force recipients back into the job market. In 1985, Layard founded the Employment Institute to press for action to prevent long-term unemployment.
 
Layard was an economic advisor to the Russian government's economic staff from 1991-1997. From 1997 to 2001, Layard was a consultant to the Labour government, and he continues to support many of the economic policies of the New Labour government in the U.K.


Recently, Layard has turned his focus to Happiness Economics.
Recently, Layard has turned his focus to Happiness Economics.
His interest in the area began with his work in the Robbins Committee on Higher Education, which Robbins was the chairman of. Layard states in his lectures that "in his [Robbins's] autobiography he says that working with Claus Moser and me at that time was “one of the most rewarding experiences” of his life. I feel exactly the same. Discussing any issue with Lionel was like a great voyage of discovery, and, if anyone ever practised the evidence-based approach to social policy, it was him." However, Layard takes a different perspective on happiness than his mentor. While Robbins looked at happiness's effects on the economy through positive economics, Layard focuses on the importance of happiness in public policy.
His interest in the area began with his work in the Robbins Committee on Higher Education, which Robbins was the chairman of. Layard states in his lectures that "in his [Robbins's] autobiography he says that working with Claus Moser and me at that time was “one of the most rewarding experiences” of his life. I feel exactly the same. Discussing any issue with Lionel was like a great voyage of discovery, and, if anyone ever practiced the evidence-based approach to social policy, it was him." However, Layard takes a different perspective on happiness than his mentor. While Robbins looked at happiness's effects on the economy through positive economics, Layard focuses on the importance of happiness in public policy.


In 2005, he published ''Happiness: Lessons from a New Science''. Layard believes that income alone is not a good approximation for happiness, and there are psychological factors that must also be considered when looking at the economy's effects. He argues that there are three major social factors that are often overlooked:
In 2005, he published ''Happiness: Lessons from a New Science''. Layard believes that income alone is not a good approximation for happiness, and there are psychological factors that must also be considered when looking at the economy's effects. He argues that there are three major social factors that are often overlooked:
Line 49: Line 58:


In addition to his work with economic policies, Layard is also involved in efforts to address clinical depression and chronic anxiety disorder. As he believes that mental illness is the greatest threat to a happy life, he leads the campaign for evidence-based psychological therapy for patients. In July, 2006, he published ''The Depression Report''.  
In addition to his work with economic policies, Layard is also involved in efforts to address clinical depression and chronic anxiety disorder. As he believes that mental illness is the greatest threat to a happy life, he leads the campaign for evidence-based psychological therapy for patients. In July, 2006, he published ''The Depression Report''.  
Layard is also involved in other "happiness promoting policies", such as dealing with the emotional aspects of children's educaiton and initiatives by local authorities to monitor and improve the happiness of their citizens.
Layard is also involved in other "happiness promoting policies", such as dealing with the emotional aspects of children's education and initiatives by local authorities to monitor and improve the happiness of their citizens.





Latest revision as of 05:13, 3 December 2007

History of Happiness Studies

Economics, the "dismal science," has traditionally been concerned with the competition between supply and demand, and concerns itself more with the market than with people. But even from the time of Aristotle, the importance of happiness in one's life has long been recognized. Many important economists and philosophers have included the concept of happiness in their works.

Jeremy Bentham

In the 18th century, Jeremy Bentham, a leading English jurist, philosopher, and social and legal reformer, proposed that public policy should maximize happiness in society. In other words, the policies of the government should help to make its citizens happier! This lead to the development of economics as a study of utility of happiness.

Bentham and his "utilitarian" economics were very influential on welfare policies.

It assumed that happiness can be compared accurately across different people. It also assumed that the utility of income is greater for rich people- in other words, richer people are happier. Thus, an important component of the welfare policies influenced by utilitarian economics tried to redistribute income so that it is more equal.

Lionel Robbins

In the early 1900s, economics was further challenged by the English economist, Lionel Robbins. He disagreed with traditional economics, and felt that the economy should take its impacts on people into deeper consideration, moving more towards the personal focus. In 1932, he published Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science, and argued that it is not necessary to know or compare a person's level of happiness in order to predict his or her behavior. Economics, to Robbins, is about "the relationship between given ends and scarce means". This helped lead to the development of "positive economics".

Robbins himself did not focus so much on the importance of happiness in public policy. However, two of his followers, Hicks and Kaldor, did attempt to create an index for happiness. Their equation roughly equaled GDP adjusted for pollution and leisure, and still placed great importance on income. From this, a number of different measurements have been developed to measure happiness, such as the Gross National Happiness Index. The first GNH index was developed by the King of Bhutan, and has been adopted by Thailand. Australia, Canada, China, and the United Kingdom are currently coming up with their own indexes. These indexes have helped to form a tool for public policy makers when looking at happiness.

The Kaldor Compensation Criteria:

Richard Layard

Born as Peter Richard Grenville Layard, this British economist has been one of, if not the most, influential individuals in the development of happiness studies.

Life

Richard Layard was born on March 15th, 1934. He was a King's Scholar at Eton, studied at King's College, Cambridge University, and obtained his Masters in Science (Economics) from the London School of Economics. He has held a number of different academic positions since the 1960s. He has also acted as an advisor to many organizations, including government institutions in the United Kingdom and Russia.

In 1991, Layard married Molly Christine Meacher. They now have two daughters and two sons.

In 2000, Layard became a Labour Life Peer in the House of Lords, gaining the title of Baron Layard of Highgate, London Borough of Haringey.


Awards

  • Fellow of Econometric Society
  • Fellow of British Academy
  • Hon. D. Soc. Sci., Brunel University


Work

Richard Layard has developed his reputation through his work with labor economics. Labor economics advocates the idea of "welfare-to-work" policies, where social welfare payments encourage/force recipients back into the job market. In 1985, Layard founded the Employment Institute to press for action to prevent long-term unemployment.

Layard was an economic advisor to the Russian government's economic staff from 1991-1997. From 1997 to 2001, Layard was a consultant to the Labour government, and he continues to support many of the economic policies of the New Labour government in the U.K.

Recently, Layard has turned his focus to Happiness Economics. His interest in the area began with his work in the Robbins Committee on Higher Education, which Robbins was the chairman of. Layard states in his lectures that "in his [Robbins's] autobiography he says that working with Claus Moser and me at that time was “one of the most rewarding experiences” of his life. I feel exactly the same. Discussing any issue with Lionel was like a great voyage of discovery, and, if anyone ever practiced the evidence-based approach to social policy, it was him." However, Layard takes a different perspective on happiness than his mentor. While Robbins looked at happiness's effects on the economy through positive economics, Layard focuses on the importance of happiness in public policy.

In 2005, he published Happiness: Lessons from a New Science. Layard believes that income alone is not a good approximation for happiness, and there are psychological factors that must also be considered when looking at the economy's effects. He argues that there are three major social factors that are often overlooked:

  • social comparisons
  • adaptation
  • changing tastes

Layard concludes that government policies and taxes should serve another purpose beyond paying for public services and redistributing income. Taxes should also counteract the "cognitive basis that causes people to work more than is good for their happiness." In other words, they should help to preserve a healthy balance between work and life.

In addition to his work with economic policies, Layard is also involved in efforts to address clinical depression and chronic anxiety disorder. As he believes that mental illness is the greatest threat to a happy life, he leads the campaign for evidence-based psychological therapy for patients. In July, 2006, he published The Depression Report. Layard is also involved in other "happiness promoting policies", such as dealing with the emotional aspects of children's education and initiatives by local authorities to monitor and improve the happiness of their citizens.



How is it measured?

link back to main page: Happiness Studies