The Tragedy of the Commons: Difference between revisions
From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''''LIFE, THE COMMONS, THE INDIVIDUAL''''' | |||
Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all. | Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all. | ||
In sharp contrast to privatism, commonism privatizes the gain but commonizes the losses. | In sharp contrast to privatism, commonism privatizes the gain but commonizes the losses. | ||
'Sustainable growth' is an oxymoron. | |||
The maximum is not the optimum. | |||
The morality of an act is a function of the state of the system at the time it is performed. | |||
The population problem has no technical solution: It requires a fundamental extension in morality. | |||
The quality of life and the quantity of it are inversely related. | |||
Tragedy is the price of freedom in the commons... In other words, in a crowded world survival requires that some freedom be given up. | |||
[[Image:Gh_signature.gif|thumb|Description]] | |||
[[The Tragedy of the Commons by Garrett Hardin, 1968]] | |||
[http://garretthardinsociety.org Garrett Hardin ] | [http://garretthardinsociety.org Garrett Hardin ] | ||
[[The Tragedy of the Commons as an Economic Concept]] | |||
Latest revision as of 21:26, 8 April 2006
LIFE, THE COMMONS, THE INDIVIDUAL
Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all.
In sharp contrast to privatism, commonism privatizes the gain but commonizes the losses.
'Sustainable growth' is an oxymoron.
The maximum is not the optimum.
The morality of an act is a function of the state of the system at the time it is performed.
The population problem has no technical solution: It requires a fundamental extension in morality.
The quality of life and the quantity of it are inversely related.
Tragedy is the price of freedom in the commons... In other words, in a crowded world survival requires that some freedom be given up.
