Rural: Difference between revisions
From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Or key problems? | Or key problems? | ||
''' | |||
Challenges:''' | '''Challenges:''' | ||
Sparse population distribution | Sparse population distribution | ||
| Line 21: | Line 22: | ||
Recycling industry’s ability to recycle for “free” or below actual cost | Recycling industry’s ability to recycle for “free” or below actual cost | ||
'''Oppurtunities/Solutions''' | |||
The strong sense of community | |||
Creation of regional recycling organizations | |||
Do not rely solely on recycling programs for revenue | |||
Latest revision as of 13:02, 28 April 2008
Rural Recycling (Nebraska)
Recycling rates increased steadily in the rural areas of Nebraska from 1992-1998, have since flattened out
Hit its peak?
Or key problems?
Challenges:
Sparse population distribution
Smaller volumes of recyclable materials per town
Distance to Markets
Feedstock recycling programs struggle
The creation of facilities which sort through mixed garbage for recyclables
The acquisition of landfills and garbage enterprises by large out-of-state companies
Recycling industry’s ability to recycle for “free” or below actual cost
Oppurtunities/Solutions
The strong sense of community
Creation of regional recycling organizations
Do not rely solely on recycling programs for revenue
