General Overview: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Spontaneous Order and The Evolution of Behaviors ==
'''''"Thus every Part was full of Vice/'''''


The history of spontaneous order begins with the tradition of Adam Smith and the invisible hand.  Adam Smith was one of the first to recognize the importance and efficiency of the market to regulate peoples behavior without requiring the concious intervention of those involved.  Hayek and others applied these ideas of unconcious regulation of the market to social behaviors and institutions, applying the term "spontaneous order".  The idea of spontaneous order posits that many of the institutions and conventions of today such as property rights, trade, honesty, contracts, and exchange have evolved through a complex mechanism of behaviors and self-interest passed down through tradition, teaching, and imitation.  Additionally the theory of spontaneous order rejects the tradition of Marx and what Hayek terms "rational constructivism", or the idea that the extended order of human society and civilization is incapable of being created or designed by reason.  According to Hayek, order and "adaptation to the unknown" can be achieved much more efficiently through evolutionary development which allows decentralization of decisions and division of authority to extend the human order, rather than allowing reason which is itself the result of an evolutionary selection process to subordinate the system of spontaneous order.
'''''Yet the whole Mass a Paradise;'''''
'''




<p align="center"> [[General Overview]] | [[Major Contributors]] | [[Game Theory Models]] | [[Objections/Arguments]] </p>
'''''The worst of all the Multitude/'''''
 
'''''Did something for the common Good"'''''
 
 
'''The Grumbling Hive''' '''by Bernard Mandeville, 1705'''
 
 
The notion of spontaneous order has had a long tradition in the history of economic thought, as and it can be traced back to as far as the 14th century. In The Grumbling Hive published in 1705,  a time of turbulent campaigns against the luxury and vice displayed by England’s ruling class, Bernard Mandeville (1670- 1733), a Dutch physician practicing in Britain, supports the idea of spontaneous order by arguing that the actions of the ruling class, despite being regarded as non-beneficial by the populace, actually contribute to the general well being. Mandeville considers that “passions” of men should not be censored as they are not detrimental to the society in which they live, but should simply be channeled in the right direction [[Sources| [2]]]
 
 
The term spontaneous order describes the fact that well structured social patterns (i.e.  property rights, money, trade, law, contracts, languages, moral systems, honesty, and ethics), despite appearing to be the product of rational, omniscient minds are actually the outcomes of spontaneous forces emerging as a consequence of individuals following self-interested ends, and have evolved through a complex mechanism of behaviors passed down from generation to generation through tradition, teaching, and imitation. In their pursuit for self-interested goals, individuals adapt their behavior to common rules and constraints, which enables them to successfully interact among themselves and maximize their gains. Spontaneous order is thus not a product of human design but of human action [[Sources| [1]]]. It is important to note that the theory of spontaneous order only applies to regularities in societies and orders of events that are not a deliberate product of human mind (i.e. constitutional law) or susceptible to purely natural phenomena (i.e. weather) [[Sources| [2]]]. Theorists of spontaneous order reject the idea that reason solely—which is believed to itself be the result of an evolutionary selection process—can allow humans to build an extended order of human society and civilization. Rather, they consider that this can only be achieved through a process of evolutionary development which allows decentralization of decisions and division of authority to include the human order.
 
 
While it would clearly be extremely interesting to give a more in depth account of the history of spontaneous order, the purpose of this project is to concentrate on the recent past, as it is modern economists who brought the greatest contributions to the development of the notion of spontaneous order. It is the work of great thinkers of the eighteenth-century Scottish Enlightment like [[David Hume]], [[Adam Ferguson]],  [[Adam Smith]]  Dugald Stewart, and Thomas Reid that set the stage for economists like [[Jean-Baptiste Say]], [[Carl Menger]], [[Ludwig von Mises]] [[Friedrich A. Hayek]], [[Samuel Bowles]] and [[Jack Knight]], to further develop the principles of spontaneous order and find them new applications in real life. The economist who has made the greatest contributions to the concept of spontaneous order was [[Friedrich A. Hayek]]. It was he who applied the term "spontaneous order" to define "a system which has developed not through the central direction or patronage of one or a few individuals but through the unintended consequences of the decisions of myriad individuals each pursuing their own interests through voluntary exchange, cooperation, and trial and error" [http://homepage.eircom.net/~odyssey/Politics/Liberty/Hayek.html Read more Hayek Quotes][[Sources| [3]]].
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
<p align="center"> [[General Overview]] | [[Major Contributors]] | [[Game Theory Models]] | [[Objections/Arguments]] | [[Sources]]</p>

Latest revision as of 06:39, 17 May 2006

"Thus every Part was full of Vice/

Yet the whole Mass a Paradise;


The worst of all the Multitude/

Did something for the common Good"


The Grumbling Hive by Bernard Mandeville, 1705


The notion of spontaneous order has had a long tradition in the history of economic thought, as and it can be traced back to as far as the 14th century. In The Grumbling Hive published in 1705, a time of turbulent campaigns against the luxury and vice displayed by England’s ruling class, Bernard Mandeville (1670- 1733), a Dutch physician practicing in Britain, supports the idea of spontaneous order by arguing that the actions of the ruling class, despite being regarded as non-beneficial by the populace, actually contribute to the general well being. Mandeville considers that “passions” of men should not be censored as they are not detrimental to the society in which they live, but should simply be channeled in the right direction [2]


The term spontaneous order describes the fact that well structured social patterns (i.e. property rights, money, trade, law, contracts, languages, moral systems, honesty, and ethics), despite appearing to be the product of rational, omniscient minds are actually the outcomes of spontaneous forces emerging as a consequence of individuals following self-interested ends, and have evolved through a complex mechanism of behaviors passed down from generation to generation through tradition, teaching, and imitation. In their pursuit for self-interested goals, individuals adapt their behavior to common rules and constraints, which enables them to successfully interact among themselves and maximize their gains. Spontaneous order is thus not a product of human design but of human action [1]. It is important to note that the theory of spontaneous order only applies to regularities in societies and orders of events that are not a deliberate product of human mind (i.e. constitutional law) or susceptible to purely natural phenomena (i.e. weather) [2]. Theorists of spontaneous order reject the idea that reason solely—which is believed to itself be the result of an evolutionary selection process—can allow humans to build an extended order of human society and civilization. Rather, they consider that this can only be achieved through a process of evolutionary development which allows decentralization of decisions and division of authority to include the human order.


While it would clearly be extremely interesting to give a more in depth account of the history of spontaneous order, the purpose of this project is to concentrate on the recent past, as it is modern economists who brought the greatest contributions to the development of the notion of spontaneous order. It is the work of great thinkers of the eighteenth-century Scottish Enlightment like David Hume, Adam Ferguson, Adam Smith Dugald Stewart, and Thomas Reid that set the stage for economists like Jean-Baptiste Say, Carl Menger, Ludwig von Mises Friedrich A. Hayek, Samuel Bowles and Jack Knight, to further develop the principles of spontaneous order and find them new applications in real life. The economist who has made the greatest contributions to the concept of spontaneous order was Friedrich A. Hayek. It was he who applied the term "spontaneous order" to define "a system which has developed not through the central direction or patronage of one or a few individuals but through the unintended consequences of the decisions of myriad individuals each pursuing their own interests through voluntary exchange, cooperation, and trial and error" Read more Hayek Quotes [3].




General Overview | Major Contributors | Game Theory Models | Objections/Arguments | Sources