Efficient Markets and Information Processing: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Kirkm (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(18 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<p align="center"> [[Purpose]] | [[Overview]] | [[Results]] | [[Biblography]] | [[Authors]]</p>
<center>{{efficient}}</center>
<br>
<p align="center">[[Image:Donald_final4.jpg|thumb|Description]]   <br>
<br>




==Overview:==
"The amount of information one can receive depends on the person's background


The experiment involves putting students into teams of 4 or 5 which function as market-makers in a asset market. The students have partial knowledge of certain characteristics of this asset, but not full information. The experiment begins when each team posts a bid and ask price for the asset which is displayed for all market participants.  Trading commences as each team is allowed to make one and only one trade with a competing market maker. Trades as well as bid/ask spreads are posted by the moderators who also vary information based on how the market adjusts.  After each round of trading, the teams are allowed to revise their bid/ask spreads. The market makers should find that the effective bid/ask spread in the market narrows and eventually reaches equilibrium based purely as a function of trading since no new information is provided. Depending on the class and students, variations can be introduced including informed outside traders or economic releases. These variations may greatly alter the market at first, as overreaction could occur. The experiment concludes when the bid/ask spreads have effectively bracketed the “true value” of the asset known only to those conducting the experiment.
knowledge about that particular information… Since different people have different


==Questions to Look At:==
background knowledge about the same information, heterogeneity of opinion occurs


Before any new information entered the market, did the market effectively move?
naturally." -Jing Chen <br>
What happens as new information arrives in the market?
Was passive or active trading more affective?


Emperical Evidence of Similar Experience:


<p align="center"> [[Purpose]] | [[Overview]] | [[Results]] | [[Biblography]] | [[Authors]]</p>
 
 
 
 
<center>{{efficient}}</center>

Latest revision as of 02:19, 2 May 2006

Home | Overview | Purpose | How To Play | Results | Terms | Sources Used | Authors


Description




"The amount of information one can receive depends on the person's background

knowledge about that particular information… Since different people have different

background knowledge about the same information, heterogeneity of opinion occurs

naturally." -Jing Chen




Home | Overview | Purpose | How To Play | Results | Terms | Sources Used | Authors