ANTH245 2007-09-17: Difference between revisions
From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
== Essay 1 (Structuralism) == | == Essay 1 (Structuralism) == | ||
=== Wiener's pessimism === | |||
=== The model of linguistics === | |||
* Historical linguistics | |||
** Grimm's law | |||
** Regular and unconscious | |||
** Phonemes and perception ("sound blindness") | |||
* Langue vs. Parole | |||
=== Kroeber's Theory === | |||
=== Structuralism === | |||
* The linguistic analogy | |||
* Elements and rules | |||
* Same as "code" | |||
== Essay 2 (Mythology) == | == Essay 2 (Mythology) == | ||
Revision as of 23:57, 16 September 2007
ANTH 245: Lecture for SEPT 17 2007
Recap
Rappaport's second cybernetic loop
- Sacred propositions -> pragramatic proposition -> the System --> Ritual experience --> Sacred propositions
- Actually similar to this:
- EXPERIENCE --> RELIGION --> POLITICS --> ECONOMICS --> EXPERIENCE
Segue
Cognitive models
Actually looking at a pattern (myth)
Levi-Strauss
Background
Essay 1 (Structuralism)
Wiener's pessimism
The model of linguistics
- Historical linguistics
- Grimm's law
- Regular and unconscious
- Phonemes and perception ("sound blindness")
- Langue vs. Parole
Kroeber's Theory
Structuralism
- The linguistic analogy
- Elements and rules
- Same as "code"
Essay 2 (Mythology)
Themes
Myth as signal and message
- Message as ontology
- Code as method of interpretation
- Myth itself is a vehicle for ontology
The function of myth
- Compare to Rappaport
- L-S focuses on content, Rappaport sacred context
- L-S helps explain myths credibility -- it overcomes contradictions
- Compare to Bateson
- Patterns
- Who is communicating?
L-S's image of the computer
- Confuses cybernetics with computation
- Actually very interested in databases
