LMS Project: Difference between revisions
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
== Define a realistic field of choices == | == Define a realistic field of choices == | ||
We are pretty much committed to the following choices: | |||
* Angel | |||
* Moodle | |||
* Sakai | |||
* Blackboard Enterprise | |||
We need to provide explanations for this field. Among the reasons are the following: | |||
* The field can't be too big. | |||
* We want to consider open source options, and NITLE provides two options -- Moodle and Sakai -- by virtue of our membership. | |||
* We need to consider Blackboard Enterprise because we already use Blackboard. It's expensive but also the path of least resistance (which isn't always a bad thing). | |||
* That leaves 3 options -- already quite a bit for a comparison involving faculty input, etc. Angel has emerged over the years as a great choice. Ryan Burke and Rafael Alvarado have done research in comparison to other options and have found it to be a leader. But this needs further justification. | |||
== Create a Comparison Matrix == | == Create a Comparison Matrix == | ||
== Hold a "Bake-off" event == | == Hold a "Bake-off" event == |
Revision as of 15:22, 17 October 2008
Goals and Success Criteria
- To select the best LMS for Dickinson
- As good as it needs to be, but not less so
- As cheap as possible, but not less so
- To select an LMS that
- Goes beyond file sharing and integrates LIS services
- E.g. a content system to integrate Library Services subject guides and information literacy
- That faculty like, can use easily
- Whose advanced features faculty can and will use
- That will improve the student learning experience
- That will fit with LIS's infrastructure of hardware, software, and system admnistration
- Goes beyond file sharing and integrates LIS services
Milestones (Fall 2008)
Define the purpose of the project
This has been accomplished, more or less, through the Stakeholders meeting held in September. The idea is pretty simple: we want something better than Blackboard, with at least the following features:
- Integration with Banner's registrar data, to automatically create courses and populate with students
- Importing of existing Blackboard courses
- Less expensive than Blackboard Enterprise
- Close wikis and blogs (to complement our open versions, and to support collaborative group work currently supported by Agora)
Define a realistic field of choices
We are pretty much committed to the following choices:
- Angel
- Moodle
- Sakai
- Blackboard Enterprise
We need to provide explanations for this field. Among the reasons are the following:
- The field can't be too big.
- We want to consider open source options, and NITLE provides two options -- Moodle and Sakai -- by virtue of our membership.
- We need to consider Blackboard Enterprise because we already use Blackboard. It's expensive but also the path of least resistance (which isn't always a bad thing).
- That leaves 3 options -- already quite a bit for a comparison involving faculty input, etc. Angel has emerged over the years as a great choice. Ryan Burke and Rafael Alvarado have done research in comparison to other options and have found it to be a leader. But this needs further justification.
Create a Comparison Matrix
Hold a "Bake-off" event
Select a place
Select a date and time
Install or set up versions of each LMS
Select test faculty
Set up faculty on each LMS account
Create matrix hand-out and/or poster
Advertize event
Create worksheets
Experiment with Course import/export
Make a Choice
Prepare for the Spring Pilot
Assumptions
Information
Moodle
Sakai
Usage Info
To create a course, click on Site Setup on the left > New at the top and enter the appropriate information on the pages found there. Look for small, blue buttons with question marks to access Help along the way, and there is full online help and search available in the instance; look for Help in the links on the left.
Your campus may create up to 10 courses with up to 100 users (combined faculty and students) in the Basic Service. This shared Sakai instance requires NITLE to add all of your faculty and student users. Please send me the first and last name of each user, and his or her campus email address. Please send as many as possible at one time showing the three separate fields, perhaps as an Excel or CSV file. I will indicate when they have been added and then you can notify your users they have access to NITLE’s Sakai Basic Service, to change their temporary passwords of <OMITTED FOR WIKI>, and they may join courses that have been created.
You will be added to the NITLE-Sakai listserve email list, and we are gradually transferring all of this collaborative interaction to our Sakai Community Project Site where you will find tips, techniques, forums, messages and eventually training material.
https://sakai.nitle.org/osp-portal/site/65545717-f7e0-41b3-00bd-1e838c272b60