Game Theory and Business Strategy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Home]] | [[Introduction]] | [[Cooperation Game]] | [[Bargaining Game]] | [[Business Strategies]] | [[Case Study]] | [[Home]] | [[Introduction]] | [[Cooperation Game]] | [[Bargaining Game]] | [[Business Strategies]] | [[Case Study]] | ||
Economists have used game theory to analyze a wide array of economic phenomena, including auctions, bargaining, duopolies, oligopolies, social network formation, and voting systems. This research usually focuses on particular sets of strategies known as equilibria in games. These "solution concepts" are usually based on what is required by norms of rationality. The most famous of these is the Nash equilibrium. A set of strategies is a Nash equilibrium if each represents a best response to the other strategies. So, if all the players are playing the strategies in a Nash equilibrium, they have no incentive to deviate, since their strategy is the best they can do given what others are doing. | |||
Revision as of 16:35, 11 April 2006
Home | Introduction | Cooperation Game | Bargaining Game | Business Strategies | Case Study
Economists have used game theory to analyze a wide array of economic phenomena, including auctions, bargaining, duopolies, oligopolies, social network formation, and voting systems. This research usually focuses on particular sets of strategies known as equilibria in games. These "solution concepts" are usually based on what is required by norms of rationality. The most famous of these is the Nash equilibrium. A set of strategies is a Nash equilibrium if each represents a best response to the other strategies. So, if all the players are playing the strategies in a Nash equilibrium, they have no incentive to deviate, since their strategy is the best they can do given what others are doing.
