Evolutionary Game Theory and Behavioral Economics: Difference between revisions
Nancyp 215 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Nancyp 215 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Deduced a few strong predictions concerning the outcomes likely to be observed in the economy | Deduced a few strong predictions concerning the outcomes likely to be observed in the economy | ||
[[File:Weibull.gif|right|]] | [[File:Weibull.gif|right|thumb|]] |
Revision as of 17:54, 30 March 2011
Intro
With the increasing importance of mathematics in economics approaches, our project is to focus on the application of quantitative science to behavioral economics. Specifically, we will investigate the more sophisticated tools needed to develop more complicated economic models as the economic thoughts evolve. The economic paradigms of interest are the Walrasian paradigm, which dominated in the third quarter of the 20th century, and another economic paradigm which we refer to as “Bowles’ paradigm” for the sake of easy distinction (it does not necessarily mean that Samuel Bowles invented this paradigm).
Section Two - Walrasian Paradigm
assumes that individuals choose actions based on the far-sighted evaluation of their consequences based on preferences that are self-regarding and exogenously determined
social interactions take the exclusive form of contractual exchanges
that increasing returns to scale can be ignored in most applications and institutions do not evolve
institutions exist to facilitate trade
represents economic behavior as the solution to a constrained optimization problem faced by a fully informed individual in a virtually institution-free environment
Deduced a few strong predictions concerning the outcomes likely to be observed in the economy