Nuclear Power: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Helferc (talk | contribs)
Helferc (talk | contribs)
Line 22: Line 22:
The samples (from different sources, food, water, etc) from up to 50km away from the plant were tested by science officials and the results were extremely alarming. What the radiation levels told the science ministry of Japan was that the releases of radioactive material found from Fukushima were at the same alarming magnitude of Chernobyl. Immediately after these tests were found to be inconclusive the food supply grown within the radius of determined radiation was banned and kept from consumers. In addition, officials recommended that the intake of tap water be limited (if used at all).  
The samples (from different sources, food, water, etc) from up to 50km away from the plant were tested by science officials and the results were extremely alarming. What the radiation levels told the science ministry of Japan was that the releases of radioactive material found from Fukushima were at the same alarming magnitude of Chernobyl. Immediately after these tests were found to be inconclusive the food supply grown within the radius of determined radiation was banned and kept from consumers. In addition, officials recommended that the intake of tap water be limited (if used at all).  
Though this accident at Fukushima was ranked at a level of 4 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, it was done so by Japanese officials which some believe to be hiding the truths. Critics believe that this accident should be measured closer to the level of Chernobyl.
Though this accident at Fukushima was ranked at a level of 4 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, it was done so by Japanese officials which some believe to be hiding the truths. Critics believe that this accident should be measured closer to the level of Chernobyl.
'''Whats Being Done to Fix the Situation'''
Immediately following the disaster, the Tokyo Electric Power Company made little efforts in coming up with a strategy, more specifically, how to stop the overheating reactors and how to make sure this problem remains contained. However, after a few weeks following the disaster TEPCO issued a plan for the future. The plan included a few key elements. First, in about nine months they planned to get back to the “cold shutdown” stage for some of the reactors. Next, in about three months they planned to indeed fix the cooling machinery. In addition to these two “promises”, TEPCO stated that they would create special covers for some of the more damaged reactors, create more containment units for radioactive water, and also build fences that would limit ocean contamination.

Revision as of 04:36, 5 May 2011

Nuclear Power

Power


Japanese Nuclear Disater at Fukushima

What Exactly Happened at Fukushima?

Crisis at Fukushima

On March 11th, 2011, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake and tsunami named Tohoku hit Japan. The chain of events that followed immediately changed the feelings on nuclear power. After the earthquake occurred, there was a release of radioactive material along with a series of equipment failures at the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant. This plant consisted of six boiling water reactors preserved by the Tokyo Electric Power Company. This was indeed the largest nuclear accident in Japanese history, and theorists believe it to even be the second largest in the history of the world, behind only Chernobyl.


What Went Wrong at the Plant?

When the earthquake began two of the reactors, five and six, were in “cold shutdown” mode because of necessary maintenance concerns. Reactor four had even been de-fueled. However, the remaining reactors were only capable of shutting down automatically after the earthquake. After the shutdown the emergency generators began to run a very essential electronic control system as well as a reactor cooling procedure, or at least attempted to do so. The Fukushima plant was meant to have top notch security, as a “seawall” capable of withstanding a 5.7m tsunami bordered the facility. The only problem was that when the waves arrived at the plant, they were measured at heights of 14m, leading to a seawall failure, and a flooded nuclear plant. This flood annihilated the entire electrical control system, meaning, all power needed to cool down the reactors was lost. Thus, the lack of cooling triggered an extreme case of overheating of reactors due to the decaying of fission products left remaining pre-accident. From there on reactor after reactor began to face either core meltdowns or containment damage. Even those reactors, 5 and 6, that were in “cold shutdown” began to overheat. Eventually, after predictions of radiation leakage, workers and those located close to the plant were ordered to keep a 12 mile distance from the plant. Though many eventually escaped to safety without damage, others suffered radiation exposure. After the phenomenon was somewhat “over” generators were restarted to cool reactors five and six (those that were still overheating but manageable to contain). However, due to excessive damage (through floods, fires, and explosions) the machinery used to cool reactors one through four remained unusable. Radioactive leaking into the water made it impossible for any imaginable repairs to be made on these four reactors.

Environmental Effects

The samples (from different sources, food, water, etc) from up to 50km away from the plant were tested by science officials and the results were extremely alarming. What the radiation levels told the science ministry of Japan was that the releases of radioactive material found from Fukushima were at the same alarming magnitude of Chernobyl. Immediately after these tests were found to be inconclusive the food supply grown within the radius of determined radiation was banned and kept from consumers. In addition, officials recommended that the intake of tap water be limited (if used at all). Though this accident at Fukushima was ranked at a level of 4 on the International Nuclear Event Scale, it was done so by Japanese officials which some believe to be hiding the truths. Critics believe that this accident should be measured closer to the level of Chernobyl.

Whats Being Done to Fix the Situation

Immediately following the disaster, the Tokyo Electric Power Company made little efforts in coming up with a strategy, more specifically, how to stop the overheating reactors and how to make sure this problem remains contained. However, after a few weeks following the disaster TEPCO issued a plan for the future. The plan included a few key elements. First, in about nine months they planned to get back to the “cold shutdown” stage for some of the reactors. Next, in about three months they planned to indeed fix the cooling machinery. In addition to these two “promises”, TEPCO stated that they would create special covers for some of the more damaged reactors, create more containment units for radioactive water, and also build fences that would limit ocean contamination.