Gender Differences: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
The vast majority of the empirical literature in labor economics talks exclusively about the economic man. (Blank, 166) What is even worse, is that this is usually not made clear in the title or in the discussion itself. These research oversimplify their results by excluding women from the sample. We believe that this is wrong not only because of the strong femisnist convictions that our group witholds but also because not including women actually leads to substatntial statistical deviations. This is especially true in developed countries such as the USA where the number of full-time female workers has been steadily increasing,and represents today a big share of the national working force. The excuse of researchers who ignore the different behavior of women in the labor market, such as the fact that the data is not tractable, is unacceptable. We are going to present the conclusions of some feminist economists who chose to analyze the often incomplete data rather than taking males as representatives of everyone. As Rebecca Blank says in her economic work, man and person are not synonymous, and economic man does not explain labor behavior nationwide. Also, she is making the distinction between “paid work” and “unpaid activities”, which are not leisure. Unpaid activities refer to the work a woman has to do in her household, which was traditionally done by women. | The vast majority of the empirical literature in labor economics talks exclusively about the economic man. (Blank, 166) What is even worse, is that this is usually not made clear in the title or in the discussion itself. These research oversimplify their results by excluding women from the sample. We believe that this is wrong not only because of the strong femisnist convictions that our group witholds but also because not including women actually leads to substatntial statistical deviations. This is especially true in developed countries such as the USA where the number of full-time female workers has been steadily increasing,and represents today a big share of the national working force. The excuse of researchers who ignore the different behavior of women in the labor market, such as the fact that the data is not tractable, is unacceptable. We are going to present the conclusions of some feminist economists who chose to analyze the often incomplete data rather than taking males as representatives of everyone. As Rebecca Blank says in her economic work, man and person are not synonymous, and economic man does not explain labor behavior nationwide. Also, she is making the distinction between “paid work” and “unpaid activities”, which are not leisure. Unpaid activities refer to the work a woman has to do in her household, which was traditionally done by women. | ||
But traditions are not what they used to be. In the last two decades, women have steadily been moving towards economic independency. They have become more educated, and their share of the national labor force has also increased. This is mainly reflected not in decisions to work more but in the wage elasticity of the labor supply curve, which namely reflects the degree women react to changes in the labor market. | |||
Elasticities show us the combined effect of the income and substitution effects. They give us a clearer image of the labor market and the reactions of individuals to social, demographic, and economic changes. Elasticity should be a valuable knowledge for policy makers , too, helping them to understand how men and women respond to different patterns. | Elasticities show us the combined effect of the income and substitution effects. They give us a clearer image of the labor market and the reactions of individuals to social, demographic, and economic changes. Elasticity should be a valuable knowledge for policy makers , too, helping them to understand how men and women respond to different patterns. | ||
Other economists such as Jonathan Schwabish from the Center for Policy Research at the Syracuse University conclude that the tendency is towards convergence of the wage elasticities of men and women. Societal norms have changed and women can more easily enter the labor force and thus respond to the labor market changes more and more like men. On the other hand, men can also change their responses to the changes in the labor market such that their elasticities reflect more those of women. Or maybe it is just a combination fo the two trends acting together. (Schwabish) | Other economists such as Jonathan Schwabish from the Center for Policy Research at the Syracuse University conclude that the tendency is towards convergence of the wage elasticities of men and women. Societal norms have changed and women can more easily enter the labor force and thus respond to the labor market changes more and more like men. On the other hand, men can also change their responses to the changes in the labor market such that their elasticities reflect more those of women. Or maybe it is just a combination fo the two trends acting together. (Schwabish) | ||
Latest revision as of 03:01, 4 May 2006
Page Overview | Income and Substitution Effects | Female vs Male Behavior in the Labor Market | Opportunity Cost of Leisure Time | Works Used
Female vs Male Behavior in the Labor Market
Gender and economics are not immutable naturally occurring phenomena but rather are socially constructed, according to one of the prominent feminist economists today, Marianne Ferber. The following discussion may not be applauded by the majority of the class, having in mind its male predominance. But the authors believe that women's different behavior in the labor market deserves a little bit of attention, after listening throughout our undergradute career about the behavior of "economic man".
The vast majority of the empirical literature in labor economics talks exclusively about the economic man. (Blank, 166) What is even worse, is that this is usually not made clear in the title or in the discussion itself. These research oversimplify their results by excluding women from the sample. We believe that this is wrong not only because of the strong femisnist convictions that our group witholds but also because not including women actually leads to substatntial statistical deviations. This is especially true in developed countries such as the USA where the number of full-time female workers has been steadily increasing,and represents today a big share of the national working force. The excuse of researchers who ignore the different behavior of women in the labor market, such as the fact that the data is not tractable, is unacceptable. We are going to present the conclusions of some feminist economists who chose to analyze the often incomplete data rather than taking males as representatives of everyone. As Rebecca Blank says in her economic work, man and person are not synonymous, and economic man does not explain labor behavior nationwide. Also, she is making the distinction between “paid work” and “unpaid activities”, which are not leisure. Unpaid activities refer to the work a woman has to do in her household, which was traditionally done by women.
But traditions are not what they used to be. In the last two decades, women have steadily been moving towards economic independency. They have become more educated, and their share of the national labor force has also increased. This is mainly reflected not in decisions to work more but in the wage elasticity of the labor supply curve, which namely reflects the degree women react to changes in the labor market.
Elasticities show us the combined effect of the income and substitution effects. They give us a clearer image of the labor market and the reactions of individuals to social, demographic, and economic changes. Elasticity should be a valuable knowledge for policy makers , too, helping them to understand how men and women respond to different patterns.
Other economists such as Jonathan Schwabish from the Center for Policy Research at the Syracuse University conclude that the tendency is towards convergence of the wage elasticities of men and women. Societal norms have changed and women can more easily enter the labor force and thus respond to the labor market changes more and more like men. On the other hand, men can also change their responses to the changes in the labor market such that their elasticities reflect more those of women. Or maybe it is just a combination fo the two trends acting together. (Schwabish)
