Retaliation and Reciprocity: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Hammonjo (talk | contribs)
Hammonjo (talk | contribs)
Line 6: Line 6:
'''''"A man ought to be  a friend to his friend and repay a gift with gift.  People should meet smiles with smiles and lies with treachery."(Fehr and Gaechter, from the Edda)'''''
'''''"A man ought to be  a friend to his friend and repay a gift with gift.  People should meet smiles with smiles and lies with treachery."(Fehr and Gaechter, from the Edda)'''''


Reciprocity is considered distinct behavior from that which is classified as cooperative or retaliatory. Reciprocity deals with actions that are simply responses, rather than actions that will lead to future material gains.
*'''Reciprocity'''
:The concept of reciprocity is a rather straight-forward one. Reciprocity deals with actions that are simply responses, not necessarily actions that will lead to future material gains. If an individual acts cooperatively and kindly towards another, ''positive reciprocity'' indicates that this action will be met with a response of an equally ''kind'' magnitude.
 
*'''Retaliation'''
:On the opposite side of the spectrum is the concept of retaliation, sometimes referred to as ''negative reciprocity''.  In the event that an individual is met with an absurdly unfair offer, or suspects a negative action on the part of another, he will '''retaliate''' and punish that individual for engaging in such behavior - '''even if that retaliatory action is detrimental to himself!'''
 
::''It is also quite important to note here that there "seems to be an emerging consensus that the propensity to punish harmful behavior is stronger than the propensity to reward friendly behavior." (Offerman, Charness and Rabin - as noted by Fehr and Gaechter)''

Revision as of 03:39, 5 May 2006

Overview | What Is Fairness? | Fairness In Game Theory | Retaliation and Reciprocity | William Baumol's Fairness Assumption | The Ultimatum Game Under Baumol's Fairness Assumption | Fairness Theory Homepage


Fairness Retaliation and Reciprocity

"A man ought to be a friend to his friend and repay a gift with gift. People should meet smiles with smiles and lies with treachery."(Fehr and Gaechter, from the Edda)

  • Reciprocity
The concept of reciprocity is a rather straight-forward one. Reciprocity deals with actions that are simply responses, not necessarily actions that will lead to future material gains. If an individual acts cooperatively and kindly towards another, positive reciprocity indicates that this action will be met with a response of an equally kind magnitude.
  • Retaliation
On the opposite side of the spectrum is the concept of retaliation, sometimes referred to as negative reciprocity. In the event that an individual is met with an absurdly unfair offer, or suspects a negative action on the part of another, he will retaliate and punish that individual for engaging in such behavior - even if that retaliatory action is detrimental to himself!
It is also quite important to note here that there "seems to be an emerging consensus that the propensity to punish harmful behavior is stronger than the propensity to reward friendly behavior." (Offerman, Charness and Rabin - as noted by Fehr and Gaechter)