Income and Substitution Effects: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
The diagram | The following diagram shows the trade-off between leisure time and time spend on income generating activities. The straight line is the 24 hour constraint, since there are a total of 24 hours in a day, and this is the maximum amount of hour workers can spend working or resting. The allocation decision is taken by looking and the time constraint and the indifference curve labeled IC, which indicates the combinations of leisure and work that will give the individual a specific level of utility. The point where the highest indifference curve is tangent to the constraint line shows how much time a person will spend working and resting. In the diagram that would be point A. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Continuing on the same line of thought, if the preference for consumption is measured by income | Continuing on the same line of thought, if the preference for consumption is measured by income rather than hours of work, the diagram can be redrawn as to show a variety of other effects. In that case, the slope of the budget constraint becomes the effective wage rate and point A, the utility maximizing point, now reflects the equality between the wage rate and the marginal rate of substitution of leisure for income, which is the first derivative of the indifference curve at that point, or its slope. Since that marginal rate of substitution is also the ratio of the marginal utility of leisure (MU<sup>L</sup>) to the marginal utility of income (MU<sup>Y</sup>), then: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
If real wages | If real wages is increased, then the worker’s constraint line will pivot up from X,Y<sub>1</sub> to X,Y<sub>2</sub>, showing that he can now purchase more goods and services by doing the same amount of work. Consequently, the worker’s utility will increase from point A on IC<sub>1</sub> to point B on IC<sub>2</sub>. The shift from point A to point B can be explained in greater detail by looking at the income and substitution effects. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
The shift in the above | The shift in the diagram above can be shown in a slightly different and more detailed way by depicting both effects separately. In the diagram below, the pure income effect is shown as the movement from point A to point C. Consequently, consumption increases from Y<sub>A</sub> to Y<sub>C</sub> and leisure time increases from X<sub>A</sub> to X<sub>C</sub>. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
As the wage rate rises, the worker will also substitute work hours for leisure hours in order to | As the wage rate rises, the worker will also substitute work hours for leisure hours in order to profit from the higher wage rate, or substitute away from leisure because of its higher opportunity cost. That effect, the substitution effect, is represented by the shift from point C to point B. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Considering only the two effects, if the substitution effect dominates the income effect, the supply | Considering only the two effects, if the substitution effect dominates the income effect, the labor supply curve will slope up and to the right, as it does at point E in the diagram below. This worker will choose to continue increasing the labor he supplies with the increasing wage rate up until point F where he is working H<sub>F</sub> hours. At that point, the income effect starts dominating and the worker will start reducing the amount of labor hours supplied. Where the supply curve is sloping up and to the right the elasticity of labor supply is positive and where it is sloping up and to the left it is negative (at point G for example). At different levels of labor supplied and income received the direction of the slope can be different for all individuals. In the next sections we will discuss why that is and what are the consequent ramifications for the different workers. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
---- | ---- | ||
[http://www.factbook.org/ Factbook.org] | [http://www.factbook.org/ Factbook.org] | ||
Revision as of 03:57, 4 May 2006
Page Overview | Income and Substitution Effects | Female vs Male Behavior in the Labor Market | Opportunity Cost of Leisure Time | Works Used
In the labor economics model, labor is supplied by the workers, who are trying to maximize their utility by choosing between work and leisure. As rational thinkers, workers are assumed to be always making a decision of how many hours to work and how many hours to rest, while being constrained by the hours available to them in a day.
The following diagram shows the trade-off between leisure time and time spend on income generating activities. The straight line is the 24 hour constraint, since there are a total of 24 hours in a day, and this is the maximum amount of hour workers can spend working or resting. The allocation decision is taken by looking and the time constraint and the indifference curve labeled IC, which indicates the combinations of leisure and work that will give the individual a specific level of utility. The point where the highest indifference curve is tangent to the constraint line shows how much time a person will spend working and resting. In the diagram that would be point A.
Continuing on the same line of thought, if the preference for consumption is measured by income rather than hours of work, the diagram can be redrawn as to show a variety of other effects. In that case, the slope of the budget constraint becomes the effective wage rate and point A, the utility maximizing point, now reflects the equality between the wage rate and the marginal rate of substitution of leisure for income, which is the first derivative of the indifference curve at that point, or its slope. Since that marginal rate of substitution is also the ratio of the marginal utility of leisure (MUL) to the marginal utility of income (MUY), then:
If real wages is increased, then the worker’s constraint line will pivot up from X,Y1 to X,Y2, showing that he can now purchase more goods and services by doing the same amount of work. Consequently, the worker’s utility will increase from point A on IC1 to point B on IC2. The shift from point A to point B can be explained in greater detail by looking at the income and substitution effects.
The shift in the diagram above can be shown in a slightly different and more detailed way by depicting both effects separately. In the diagram below, the pure income effect is shown as the movement from point A to point C. Consequently, consumption increases from YA to YC and leisure time increases from XA to XC.
As the wage rate rises, the worker will also substitute work hours for leisure hours in order to profit from the higher wage rate, or substitute away from leisure because of its higher opportunity cost. That effect, the substitution effect, is represented by the shift from point C to point B.
The shift from point A to point B is the net result from both effects. The relative magnitude of the two effects depends on the circumstances. In some cases the substitution effect is greater than the income effect, whereas in other cases the income will be greater than the substitution effect.
Considering only the two effects, if the substitution effect dominates the income effect, the labor supply curve will slope up and to the right, as it does at point E in the diagram below. This worker will choose to continue increasing the labor he supplies with the increasing wage rate up until point F where he is working HF hours. At that point, the income effect starts dominating and the worker will start reducing the amount of labor hours supplied. Where the supply curve is sloping up and to the right the elasticity of labor supply is positive and where it is sloping up and to the left it is negative (at point G for example). At different levels of labor supplied and income received the direction of the slope can be different for all individuals. In the next sections we will discuss why that is and what are the consequent ramifications for the different workers.
