Conclusions: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<center>[[Faith Based Social Justice Movements]] | [[Interfaith Alliance]] | [[Liberation Theology]] | [[American Friends Service Committee]] | [[Catholic Worker]] | [[National Religious Partnership for the Environment]] | [[Conclusions]] | [[Sources]]</center>
After the experiences of Continental Illinois the idea that a bank could be too big to fail went out the window. This statement rings true because large banks did fail during this period and their shareholders lost their holdings. The government stepped in to prevent extreme spillover effects that could be caused by widespread depositor runs, but maybe more importantly a decrease in public confidence toward the banking system and its solvency.
 
 
The idea that large banks such as Continental were too bad to fail was proven to be bogus, but one did learn that during this period in time there were banks that were largest enough where in fact that they were too big to liquidate. It would have been almost logistically impossible to liquidate such a large bank; the uninsured depositors would be caught waiting for their funds during potentially long proceedings which would be incredibly disruptive to the banking system.
The faith based organizations discussed on the previous pages all work for social justice.  Although some of the organizations are based on the principles of one faith, many of these organizations involve people of many faiths and from many walks of life.
 
return to [[Faith Based Social Justice Movements]]

Revision as of 19:05, 28 November 2006

After the experiences of Continental Illinois the idea that a bank could be too big to fail went out the window. This statement rings true because large banks did fail during this period and their shareholders lost their holdings. The government stepped in to prevent extreme spillover effects that could be caused by widespread depositor runs, but maybe more importantly a decrease in public confidence toward the banking system and its solvency.

The idea that large banks such as Continental were too bad to fail was proven to be bogus, but one did learn that during this period in time there were banks that were largest enough where in fact that they were too big to liquidate. It would have been almost logistically impossible to liquidate such a large bank; the uninsured depositors would be caught waiting for their funds during potentially long proceedings which would be incredibly disruptive to the banking system.