Economics today (Positive) & its future: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
Morrisj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<center>[[Group 3: Normative and Positive Traditions in Economics|Home]] | [[Introduction: What are Positive and Normative Economics?|Introduction]] | [[Normative Economics]] | [[Positive Economics]] | [[What the classicals said]] | [[Transition period, Seperation, and their labeling|Transition]] | [[Economics today (Positive) & its future]] | [[What we learn from this]] | [[Our Conclusions|Conclusion]] | [[Sources and Works Cited|Works Cited]]</center>
<center>[[Group 3: Normative and Positive Traditions in Economics|Home]] | [[Introduction: What are Positive and Normative Economics?|Introduction]] | [[Normative Economics]] | [[Positive Economics]] | [[What the classicals said]] | [[Transition period, Seperation, and their labeling|Transition]] | [[Economics today (Positive) & its future]] | [[What we learn from this]] | [[Our Conclusions|Conclusion]] | [[Sources and Works Cited|Works Cited]]</center>
Economics today has seemed to follow the path laid out by Friedman and the logical positivists and empiricists.  Neoclassical economics which focuses on the scientific and positivist traditions within economics is the dominant view among economists and educators today.  However, there is a growing trend which is trying to move away from the focus of purely positivist conclusions.  Sen and other are trying to return to Smith and other classicals who advocated positions in both normative and positive economics, citing the merits of each.  Dickinson College in particuar has a very strong commitment to cultivating diverse views in all of its subjects, including economics.  The economics department requires all economic majors to take a Contending Perspectives class in which students learn several criticisms of neoclassical economics and suggestions for alternative systems.  Additionally, there are several faculty who come from a heterodox background and have significant works within their fields.


==Ethics and engineering==
==Ethics and engineering==

Revision as of 01:58, 2 May 2007

Home | Introduction | Normative Economics | Positive Economics | What the classicals said | Transition | Economics today (Positive) & its future | What we learn from this | Conclusion | Works Cited

Economics today has seemed to follow the path laid out by Friedman and the logical positivists and empiricists. Neoclassical economics which focuses on the scientific and positivist traditions within economics is the dominant view among economists and educators today. However, there is a growing trend which is trying to move away from the focus of purely positivist conclusions. Sen and other are trying to return to Smith and other classicals who advocated positions in both normative and positive economics, citing the merits of each. Dickinson College in particuar has a very strong commitment to cultivating diverse views in all of its subjects, including economics. The economics department requires all economic majors to take a Contending Perspectives class in which students learn several criticisms of neoclassical economics and suggestions for alternative systems. Additionally, there are several faculty who come from a heterodox background and have significant works within their fields.

Ethics and engineering

Serious economics scholars vs. casual understanding

Caldwell

Home | Introduction | Normative Economics | Positive Economics | What the classicals said | Transition | Economics today (Positive) & its future | What we learn from this | Conclusion | Works Cited