Economics Today & Its Future: Difference between revisions
From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<center>[[Group 3: Normative and Positive Traditions in Economics|Home]] | [[Introduction: What are Positive and Normative Economics?|Introduction]] | [[Normative Economics]] | [[Positive Economics]] | [[Economics Today & Its Future]] | [[Our Conclusions|Conclusion]] | [[Sources and Works Cited|Works Cited]]</center> | <center>[[Group 3: Normative and Positive Traditions in Economics|Home]] | [[Introduction: What are Positive and Normative Economics?|Introduction]] | [[Normative Economics]] | [[Positive Economics]] | [[Economics Today & Its Future]] | [[Our Conclusions|Conclusion]] | [[Sources and Works Cited|Works Cited]]</center> | ||
The logical empiricists of the 1950s took great steps back from the bold claims of 1920s-era logical positivists. However, their ideas of cognitive significance varied greatly, and even their most re | The logical empiricists of the 1950s took great steps back from the bold claims of 1920s-era logical positivists. However, their ideas of cognitive significance varied greatly, and even their most re | ||
<center>[[Group 3: Normative and Positive Traditions in Economics|Home]] | [[Introduction: What are Positive and Normative Economics?|Introduction]] | [[Normative Economics]] | [[Positive Economics]] | [[Economics Today & Its Future]] | [[Our Conclusions|Conclusion]] | [[Sources and Works Cited|Works Cited]]</center> | <center>[[Group 3: Normative and Positive Traditions in Economics|Home]] | [[Introduction: What are Positive and Normative Economics?|Introduction]] | [[Normative Economics]] | [[Positive Economics]] | [[Economics Today & Its Future]] | [[Our Conclusions|Conclusion]] | [[Sources and Works Cited|Works Cited]]</center> | ||
Revision as of 05:04, 2 May 2007
The logical empiricists of the 1950s took great steps back from the bold claims of 1920s-era logical positivists. However, their ideas of cognitive significance varied greatly, and even their most re
