ANTH245 2007-09-24: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Alvaradr (talk | contribs)
Alvaradr (talk | contribs)
Line 38: Line 38:
== Comparisons ==
== Comparisons ==
* L-S
* L-S
** Same premises, different units and rules
* Rappaport
* Rappaport
** Compare culture patterns and schema to R's sacred propositions
* Bateson
* Bateson
** Patterns


= Selby =
= Selby =

Revision as of 14:17, 23 September 2007

Go to Main Page

Business

  • Responses ...

Recap

The transformational process

  • Review the basic idea of how the linear order is translated into a structural pattern
    • Go over the examples
  • Compare to chiasmus

The canonical formula of myth

  • Explain what the formula means (unpack it into three transforms)
  • Briefly mention Mosko's work

Who is communicating with whom?

  • Describe the process as a two-stage operation
    • Story is received and parsed for consciousness consumption
    • Generates a second story, which is parsed for unconscious consumption
  • The big question -- In the case of the second process, who communicates with whom?

Segue

The Computer as symbol and as tool

  • Taking Levi-Strauss' references to the computer seriously

Computing and the Database

  • All of L-S's references to cybernetics and computing are really references to computing
  • Databases represent structure
  • Databases represent (logical) possibility

Colby

  • General Inquirer System
  • The IBM 7090
    • 32K addressable memory / $3M (in 1960s dollars!)
    • See also this and this.
  • Coding methods
  • Cultural Grammars

Comparisons

  • L-S
    • Same premises, different units and rules
  • Rappaport
    • Compare culture patterns and schema to R's sacred propositions
  • Bateson
    • Patterns

Selby

Tobin and the HRAF

The HRAF

What is a computer?

Why the controversy?

  • The status of "codes"
  • Violence to texts

Themes

Text and Code

Heuristic vs Objectivist

Cybernetics of Interpretation

The Function and Image of the Database

Ontology vs. Discourse

Observations