ANTH245 2007-09-24: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 15: Line 15:
  5. HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES → SCAVENGERS (e.g. Raven, Coyote)
  5. HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES → SCAVENGERS (e.g. Raven, Coyote)
  6. ERGO, Ravens symbolize overcoming the opposition between life and death  
  6. ERGO, Ravens symbolize overcoming the opposition between life and death  
** A logic of symbols ...
* A logic of symbols ... compare to ''dialectic''
* Compare to [[wikipedia:Chiasmus|chiasmus]]
* Compare to [[wikipedia:Chiasmus|chiasmus]]



Revision as of 15:16, 24 September 2007

Go to Main Page

Business

  • Responses ...

Recap

The transformational process

  • Review the basic idea of how the linear order is translated into a structural pattern
    • A primary and unmediable opposition is posited and successively replaced by more mediable categories, e.g.
0. LIEF : DEATH → ???
1. LIFE : DEATH :: FARMING : WARFARE 
2. FARMING : WARFARE → HUNTING
3. HUNTING replaces WARFARE
4. FARMING : HUNTING :: HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES
5. HERBIVORES : CARNIVORES → SCAVENGERS (e.g. Raven, Coyote)
6. ERGO, Ravens symbolize overcoming the opposition between life and death 
  • A logic of symbols ... compare to dialectic
  • Compare to chiasmus

The canonical formula of myth

  • Explain what the formula means (unpack it into three transforms)
  • Briefly mention Mosko's work

Who is communicating with whom?

  • Describe the process as a two-stage operation
    • Story is received and parsed for consciousness consumption
    • Generates a second story, which is parsed for unconscious consumption
  • The big question -- In the case of the second process, who communicates with whom?

Segue

The Computer as symbol and as tool

  • Taking Levi-Strauss' references to the computer seriously

Computing and the Database

  • All of L-S's references to cybernetics and computing are really references to computing
  • Databases represent structure
  • Databases represent (logical) possibility

Colby

General Inquirer System

  • The IBM 7090
    • 32K addressable memory / $3M (in 1960s dollars!)
    • See also this and this.
  • Current system
    • EXERCISE:
      • Pick an essay and dump it in
      • Discuss results

The Process

  • Text + Thesaurus (Dictionary) + Rules
  • Word counts
  • Correlations

Text

  • 9,000 stories
  • 5 culture areas
  • Translated into English

Dictionary

  • Three categories
    1. Hi freq && polysemous
    2. Med freq && polysemous
    3. Monosemous
  • Mapped to themes

Rules

  • Actually a SQL join ...
  • leftover words become "feedback data"

Observations

  • Note role of feedback
  • Flattening of stories unless filtered ahead of time
    • E.g. bimodal results may be the result of conflating two story types

Cultural Grammars

Comparisons

  • L-S
    • Same premises, different units and rules
      • Premises: structure = elements + rules
      • Units: mythemes vs. words that signify conceptual domains
  • Rappaport
    • Compare culture patterns and schema to R's sacred propositions
  • Bateson
    • Patterns

Selby

  • Explain the ETHNOGRAPH -- QDA software
  • Instead of myths, field notes and transcriptions of discourse
  • A kind of data mining
  • What is the status of the codes?
  • Heuristic vs. Objective status of the codes
  • Cybernetic interpretation

Tobin and the HRAF

The HRAF

What is a computer?

Why the controversy?

  • The status of "codes"
  • Violence to texts

Themes

Text and Code

Heuristic vs Objectivist

Cybernetics of Interpretation

The Function and Image of the Database

Ontology vs. Discourse

Observations