Happiness in Economics: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
[http://www.jstor.org/view/00130133/di983549/98p0497i/0?frame=noframe&userID=40093d91@dickinson.edu/01c0a80a6600501ce9092&dpi=3&config=jstor article, Happiness and Economic Performance] | [http://www.jstor.org/view/00130133/di983549/98p0497i/0?frame=noframe&userID=40093d91@dickinson.edu/01c0a80a6600501ce9092&dpi=3&config=jstor article, Happiness and Economic Performance] | ||
[http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8401269 The Economist Article 1] | [http://www.economist.com/finance/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8401269 The Economist Article 1] | ||
[http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1758215/posts The Economist Article 2] | [http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1758215/posts The Economist Article 2] | ||
Revision as of 21:11, 13 November 2007
What is Happiness?
Simply Textbook
Most economists take it as a matter of course that higher income leads to higher happiness. And why not? A higher income expands individuals' and countries' opportunity set; that is, more goods and services can be consumed. The few people not interested in more comodities need not consume them; they have the freedom to dispose of any unwanted surplus free of charge. It therefore seems obvious that income and happiness go together (provided, of course, that the two are correctly measured). Consequently, economics textbooks do not even make an effort to come up with a reason, but simply state that utility 'U' is raised by income 'Y'
article, what can economists learn from happiness research?
article,Some uses of Happiness Data in Economics
article, Happiness and Economic Performance
