Critiques of the Socialist Calculation Debate: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 1: Line 1:
== Hayek is subjective ==
== Hayek is subjective ==


Although Hayek has fervent supporters at a number of schools, we should not ignore the presence of his opponents. Not a few eminent economists attack Hayek for being overly subjective and now knowing well enough human nature.
Although Hayek has fervent supporters at a number of schools, we should not ignore the presence of his opponents. Not a few eminent economists attack Hayek for being overly subjective and now knowing well enough human nature. Lawson (1992) has argues that psychological and sociological research has revealed that human behaviour is highly routinized and coordinated in the main by unconscious brain functions. Furthermore, Dennett claims that experiments in neuropsychology indicate that people act first and become concious of their intention to act later.  





Revision as of 04:13, 3 December 2007

Hayek is subjective

Although Hayek has fervent supporters at a number of schools, we should not ignore the presence of his opponents. Not a few eminent economists attack Hayek for being overly subjective and now knowing well enough human nature. Lawson (1992) has argues that psychological and sociological research has revealed that human behaviour is highly routinized and coordinated in the main by unconscious brain functions. Furthermore, Dennett claims that experiments in neuropsychology indicate that people act first and become concious of their intention to act later.





















Friedrich A. Hayek || What is Socialist Calculation Debate? || Critiques of the Socialist Calculation Debate || Advocates for the Socialist Calculation Debate || Knowledge Problem || Questions to Ask