William Baumol's Fairness Assumption: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Hartl (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:


*'''Superfairness'''<nowiki>:</nowiki>
*'''Superfairness'''<nowiki>:</nowiki>
::
::If the bundles held by both A and B can be reduced without giving rise to envy, then the distribution is ''superfair''.
 
*'''Strict Superfairness'''<nowiki>:</nowiki>
::If A ''strictly'' prefers his bundle to the bundle received by B (and vice versa), then the distribution of goods X and Y is said to be ''strictly superfair''. That is, if
 
::If the bundle received by each individual is ''strictly'' preferred by that individual to the bundles received by


=<center>Properties of Fariness</center>=
=<center>Properties of Fariness</center>=

Revision as of 02:42, 11 April 2006

Overview | What Is Fairness? | Fairness In Game Theory | Retaliation and Reciprocity | William Baumol's Fairness Assumption | The Ultimatum Game Under Baumol's Fairness Assumption | Fairness Theory Homepage





Definitions

For convenience, the below definitions assume a world with two individuals, A and B, and two goods, X and Y


  • Envy:
If A prefers to his own bundle, the bundle of goods held by B, A is said to envy B.
  • Fairness:
The distribution of goods X and Y is fair if no envy is involved.
  • Superfairness:
If the bundles held by both A and B can be reduced without giving rise to envy, then the distribution is superfair.

Properties of Fariness

Properties of Superfairness

Multistage Superfairness

Applications