DDT and Malaria: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Dragon (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Dragon (talk | contribs)
Line 43: Line 43:
== Economic Costs of Malaria ==
== Economic Costs of Malaria ==


Cost (in Rand) % of Total
<pre> Cost (in Rand) % of Total
Indirect Costs Productivity Costs 5,082,550 41
Indirect Costs Productivity Costs 5,082,550 41
Line 52: Line 52:
2,122,577
2,122,577
17
17
Hospital Costs 1,197,737 10
Hospital Costs 1,197,737 10 </pre>
 


== Benefits of DDT usage ==
== Benefits of DDT usage ==

Revision as of 14:15, 17 November 2008

History and Background

What is DDT?

DDT and Malaria Control

Usage around the world

The Effects of DDT on the Environment

Persistence

Bioaccumulation and Biomagnification

Vector Resistance

Animal Populations

The Effects of DDT on Human Health

In Africa

The Human Health Controversy

The Economic Analysis of DDT

Use in Africa for Malaria Control

Economic Costs of Malaria

		Cost (in Rand)	% of Total
Indirect Costs	Productivity Costs	5,082,550	41
			
Direct Costs	Malaria Tests	595,167	5
	Evacuation Costs	2,794,000	22
	Drug Costs	640,349	5
	Physician/Nurse Time
	2,122,577
	17
	Hospital Costs	1,197,737	10 

Benefits of DDT usage

WHO's support for DDT use in Africa

Alternative Malaria Controls

Conclusion

References

Dichloro-Diphenyl-Trichloroethane, commonly known as DDT, is a pesticide that has been banned in the United States, Europe, and many other countries. Currently it is used for an emergency basis in many developing countries, such as Africa and South America, for combatting Malaria. We will be focusing on Sub-saharan Africa and their uses of pesticides, specifically DDT, to battle Malaria. We understand the externality costs on the health of humans and wildlife, but in these extenuating circumstances we support the use of DDT as a lesser of two evils. By analyizing the costs and benefits of using DDT in these third world countries, we have found that the use of DDT has lower monetary costs. The risk of humans contracting Malaria, has higher economic costs that hinder the development of the country. It is common in Sub-Saharan African countries, for the citizens to be more concerned with their conditions rather than factors that could effect their health later in life. However, we hope to also stress the necessity of devloping alternative technology that could become viable in the future to eliminate Malaria .