Arms and Influence: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
''"The power to hurt - the sheer unacquisitive, unproductive power to destroy things that somebody treasures, to inflict pain and grief - is a kind of bargaining power, not easy to use but used often."'' | ''"The power to hurt - the sheer unacquisitive, unproductive power to destroy things that somebody treasures, to inflict pain and grief - is a kind of bargaining power, not easy to use but used often."'' | ||
After the publication of The Stategy of Conflict, Schelling wrote a book that | After the publication of The Stategy of Conflict, Schelling wrote a book that seemed to focus more on the threats of violence in bargaining of military conflict. Arms and Influence seems mostly interested with the points on different international policies a country might take in deterring or acting in a war. Some of the concepts covered more in depth are the ideas on "brinkmanship". The concept of brinkmanship is being at the point of total war without actually moving into it. This borderline threat keeps nations in check with one another. This directly correlates with | ||
Revision as of 03:58, 27 April 2006
"The power to hurt - the sheer unacquisitive, unproductive power to destroy things that somebody treasures, to inflict pain and grief - is a kind of bargaining power, not easy to use but used often."
After the publication of The Stategy of Conflict, Schelling wrote a book that seemed to focus more on the threats of violence in bargaining of military conflict. Arms and Influence seems mostly interested with the points on different international policies a country might take in deterring or acting in a war. Some of the concepts covered more in depth are the ideas on "brinkmanship". The concept of brinkmanship is being at the point of total war without actually moving into it. This borderline threat keeps nations in check with one another. This directly correlates with
