Differences: Difference between revisions
From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<center> Though the Black Panther Party and the National of Islam were not the sole groups that benefited African-Americans, they viewed themselves as different from the other groups. Unlike groups such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) and the National Urban League, both the BPP and NOI systematically recruited from the poorest segments of the black community and developed rhetoric that appealed to many poor blacks, particularly males. They also fully recognized the important role that culture played in popular movements yet developed drastically different interpretations of black culture. | |||
The NOI vilified black popular culture. They felt that music, fashion and dance were ways of _____. Although it made overt appeals to the socially and economically displaced majority of the black community, the Nation made virulent attacks against black folk culture. | The NOI vilified black popular culture. They felt that music, fashion and dance were ways of _____. Although it made overt appeals to the socially and economically displaced majority of the black community, the Nation made virulent attacks against black folk culture. |
Revision as of 00:48, 4 May 2006
The NOI vilified black popular culture. They felt that music, fashion and dance were ways of _____. Although it made overt appeals to the socially and economically displaced majority of the black community, the Nation made virulent attacks against black folk culture.
The BPP not only celebrated black popular culture, but extolled some of the crudest elements of what they called "lumpenproletariat" culture. The Panthers simultaneously attacked cultural nationalists who insisted that a cultural renewal of black America was essential for black liberation.
Back to the Black Power Movement main page Black Power Movement