Long Term Effects: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
===Private Saving=== | ===Private Saving=== | ||
<center><font size=3>The | ---- | ||
<center><font size=4>'''Changes in private saving partially offset the impact of larger deficits on national saving</font></center> | |||
<font size=3>'''The extent to which the impacts are offset depends on:'''</font> | |||
:*<font size=3>The policies that resulted in the deficit (for example) | |||
:::*''Tax cuts'' | |||
:::*''Larger child entitlement benefits'' | |||
:::*''Federal entitlement benefits''</font> | |||
:*<font size=3>People's perceptions about future policy actions</font> | |||
<center><font size=4>Example from the past: 1970-2004</font></center> | |||
From 1970 to 2004, gross private saving rose by about 0.4% of GDP when the federal deficit increased by 1.0% of GDP. This relationship represents an average that covers a variety of economic conditions and many different policy measures that changed the federal deficit during that time. Although this is not the '''best''' estimate of how much private saving might change in the future in response to a specific policy change, it does show how private saving can offset an increase in the federal deficit over a long period of time. | |||
==Productive Capacity and Capital Inflows== | ==Productive Capacity and Capital Inflows== |
Revision as of 03:46, 4 May 2006
Future Living Standards
- Reduced because of:
- Slowed accumulation of wealth due to lowered national saving
- Decrease in labor productivity due to a reduction in domestic investment
National Saving
Reasons for shifts from saving to consumption:
- reductions in taxes → increase private consumption
- increases in government spending for federal entitlement programs → increase private consumption
- increases in government purchases → increase government consumption
Private Saving
The extent to which the impacts are offset depends on:
- The policies that resulted in the deficit (for example)
- Tax cuts
- Larger child entitlement benefits
- Federal entitlement benefits
- People's perceptions about future policy actions
From 1970 to 2004, gross private saving rose by about 0.4% of GDP when the federal deficit increased by 1.0% of GDP. This relationship represents an average that covers a variety of economic conditions and many different policy measures that changed the federal deficit during that time. Although this is not the best estimate of how much private saving might change in the future in response to a specific policy change, it does show how private saving can offset an increase in the federal deficit over a long period of time.
Productive Capacity and Capital Inflows
Affects of domestic investment (private and public)
- On the growth of US output and productivity:
- raises Labor Productivity
- for a given level of technology, an increase in capital raises output per worker
- raises Total Factor Productivity growth
- new capital often leads to the introduction of new technologies into the production process
- raises Labor Productivity
- Offsetting of adverse effects:
- Net capital inflows from abroad tend to rise as US saving falls
- additional investment opportunities open up for foreigners as US saving falls
- foreign capital finances investment that under prevailing market conditions would otherwise not be funded
- Net capital inflows from abroad tend to rise as US saving falls
The downward trend in gross national saving has beeb accompanied by an upward trend in net capital inflows. On average, each decline in gross national saving equal to 1.0% of GDP has been offset by an increase in net capital inflows from abroad amounting to 0.4% of GDP. By financing domestic investment in productive capacity, the increase in net capital inflows has supported labor productivity and the income of workers when the national saving rate falls. However, this also increases the level of US foreign indebtedness. Capital inflows only partially offset the loss of future living standards that result from the adverse effects of federal deficits on national saving because future payments to foreigners will be paid out of future national income generated by the investment financed by capital inflows. Even still, given low national saving, the US is better off as a result of capital inflows.
Financial Markets
In changing national saving, investment, and net capital inflows, federal deficits also affect:
- Interest Rates
- Exchange Rates
- Stock Market Values
- Increasing the demand for credit → higher interest rates
- higher interest rates tend to attract foreign capital, putting upward pressure on the US dollar
- Decrease in capital accumulation → fall in stock market values
- however, the federal deficit is not nearly as important as other factors in determining movements in the stock market
- Movements in financial-market variables help to restore balance between the amount of investment demanded and desired national saving plus net capital inflows
- Sensitivity of financial variables dictate how much interest rates, exchange rates and stock market values need to change in order to restore balance.
- For example, the response of net capital inflows can dampen movements in the interest rate, moderating the extent to which domestic investment is crowded out.
Even with small movements in the interest rates, the federal deficit can significantly impact the future living standards because of its impact on national saving and wealth accumulation. A sustained federal deficit amounting to 1.0% of GDP raises the interest rates by 0.2% to 0.6%.