Conclusions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Revision as of 19:59, 3 December 2006 by 172.16.60.184 (talk)
Jump to navigationJump to search

After the experiences of Continental Illinois the idea that a bank could be too big to fail went out the window in the sense that banks had the ability to collapse. This statement rings true because large banks did fail during this period and their shareholders lost their holdings. The government stepped in to prevent extreme spillover effects that could be caused by widespread depositor runs, but the more important effect was psychological. Even though public confidence decreased toward the banking system all depositors were paid back and the situation never reached the levels of bank defaults that were seen in the depression.

The idea that large banks such as Continental were too bad to fail was proven to be bogus, but one did learn that during this period in time there were banks that were large enough where in fact they were too big to liquidate. It would have been almost logistically impossible to liquidate such a large bank; the uninsured depositors would be caught waiting for their funds during potentially long proceedings which would be incredibly disruptive to the banking system.