Buck v. Bell

From Dickinson College Wiki
Revision as of 18:34, 28 April 2009 by Aaron.williams (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200, 71 L. Ed. 1000, 47 S. Ct. 584 (1927)

Appellants:

  • Carrie Buck

Defendant:

  • Bell, superintendent of the Virginia State Colony for Epileptics and Feeble Minded


The Court's opinion was given by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

Facts of the Case

Carrie Buck was a feeble minded, 18 year old, white woman, who was the daughter of a feeble minded woman and the mother of an illegitimate feeble minded child. In 1924, an Act of Virginia is created that allows for the sterilization of those with mental defect in cases where the welfare of the patient and society may be promoted. The defendant ordered the sterilization by salpingectomy of the appellant Carrie Buck, who then brought this case to the Circuit Court of Amherst County.

Issues Involved

The issues involved in this case include, but are not limited to:

  1. Whether the Virginia law, which authorizes the sterilization of the mentally disabled, violates the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment.
  2. Whether the Virginia law, which authorizes the sterilization of the mentally disabled, violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment.

Decision

The Supreme Court affirmed the Virginia Court of Appeals decision to affirm a judgment of the Circuit Court of Amherst County, which validated the order by the defendant to perform the operation of salpingectomy upon Carrie Buck.

Holding and Rationale of the Court

The Virginia law, which authorizes the sterilization of the mentally disabled in no way violates the due process and equal protection clauses of the fourteenth amendment.

The rationale of the Court was:


Additional Opinions

Justice Butler dissented with the Court's opinion.

Additional Links

The American Eugenics Movement

Eugenics and the Supreme Court

Case Summary from OYEZ