Economic Man

From Dickinson College Wiki
Revision as of 21:10, 19 April 2011 by Elinskys (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search
Amartya Sen

1. Introduction

Throughout the history of economics, there has existed a debate over the concept of the economic man (homo economicus). According to this concept, human beings are unwaveringly rational and self interested economic actors. The goal of the economic man is to maximize his or her own utility. We began the class with a debate over slavery and an economists’ opposition to slavery, based on a violation of the notion of an economic man.

Some thinkers, most notably Thomas Carlyle, believed that some groups did not possess the intelligence or reasoning abilities necessary to govern themselves. Therefore, other more “advanced” races should be in charge in order to ensure their wellbeing and to maximize world productivity. In opposition to this line of thinking was J.S. Mill and a long list of abolitionists who believed that Thomas Carlyle’s desire to create a ruling race to subject all “sub-human” races was a direct violation of the principle of the economic man. Mill's belief was that regardless of race or education level, people have the ability as economic actors to make the rational decisions that will maximize their own utility and thereby ensure their wellbeing.

2. Overview of Sen's Ideas

3. J.S. Mill v Sen

J.S. Mill







4. Smith v Sen

Adam Smith







5. Carlyle v Sen

Thomas Carlyle







6. Conclusion/Wrap-up

7. References

The Idea of Justice Sen, Amartya, 1933-

Poverty, inequality and health : an international perspective Leon, David A.

The political economy of hunger : selected essays Drèze, Jean.

On ethics and economics Sen, Amartya Kumar. Specifically on Welfare and Human choice.

The Secret History of the Dismal Science Series Leavy, David M, Peace, Sandra J