Recycling: Difference between revisions

From Dickinson College Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
Woodrofj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Woodrofj (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 31: Line 31:
'''''Curbside recycling''''':  by providing easy access to recycling, residents will be more likely to recycle.
'''''Curbside recycling''''':  by providing easy access to recycling, residents will be more likely to recycle.


''Drop-off locations'': in areas that cannot economically support curbside recycling, strategically located drop-off centers provide residents an opportunity to recycle.


''Increase number of recyclable products'': expanding the list of recyclables will reduce that amount of waste landfilled and incinerated.
'''''Drop-off locations''''': in areas that cannot economically support curbside recycling, strategically located drop-off centers provide residents an opportunity to recycle.


''Mandatory recycling'':  if residents are required to recycle, less recyclable waste will be discarded rather than recycled.  Fines for violations will increase the effectiveness of mandatory recycling.


''Unit pricing'':  by charging residents per unit of trash discarded (for example purchasing trash bags), residents have an financial incentive to recycle rather than discard products in the trash.
'''''Increase number of recyclable products''''':  expanding the list of recyclables will reduce that amount of waste landfilled and incinerated.
 
 
'''''Mandatory recycling''''':  if residents are required to recycle, less recyclable waste will be discarded rather than recycled.  Fines for violations will increase the effectiveness of mandatory recycling.
 
 
'''''Unit pricing''''':  by charging residents per unit of trash discarded (for example purchasing trash bags), residents have an financial incentive to recycle rather than discard products in the trash.
 
 
'''''Public education and outreach''''':  by making people more aware of how to recycle and why it is important, recycling participation will be greater.


''Public education and outreach'':  by making people more aware of how to recycle and why it is important, recycling participation will be greater.





Latest revision as of 06:27, 30 April 2008

Environmental Economics Sp 08 | Mexico: Trade and the Environment | Recycling | Local Recycling Policies | Urban Sprawl | Trade and the Environment | Optimist Pessimist Debate | Forestry in China


Recycling in the United States


Aluminum | Plastic | Glass | Paper


Waste Generation and Recycling

As population grows and access to limited resources such as land and water continue to dwindle, waste management becomes an increasingly urgent and controversial issue faced by the government and public alike. How society deals with the waste it produces can have far-reaching implications both for the well-being of future generations and the environment on which humans depend.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) created a solid waste hierarchy to outline the preferred management techniques of waste. First and foremost, the EPA encourages source reduction which includes changing the packaging design of products, increasing product-life, and reducing the toxicity involved in the manufacture and completion of a product. Barring source reduction, the next best alternative for waste management is to recycle or reuse the used product and compost organic wastes. The remaining waste should be taken to a combustion facility or landfill for disposal (EPA 2005).

Despite the acceptance of the solid waste hierarchy, often times reduction of waste does not occur because of a lack of consumer pressure driving industry to incorporate waste-reducing innovations into their manufacturing processes or products. Sometimes even with a market incentive, companies lack the access to better, environmentally-friendly technology or the producer pressure to change. Because of this, an emerging competitive market has been created for waste-recycling technologies, the next best alternative to reduction. In 2006, the United States produced a little more than 251 million tons of municipal solid waste, 82 million tons of which was diverted from landfills for recycling. The energy savings accrued through the recycling of these materials amounted to the energy equivalent of more than 10 billion gallons of petrol (EPA 2006).


(EPA 2008)


In an effort to reduce the amount of waste that is landfilled and incinerated, residents should incorporate waste reduction and reuse into their daily lifestyle. For all other wastes, the rate of recycling can be improved with several policy initiatives.


Policies to Increase Recycling

Curbside recycling: by providing easy access to recycling, residents will be more likely to recycle.


Drop-off locations: in areas that cannot economically support curbside recycling, strategically located drop-off centers provide residents an opportunity to recycle.


Increase number of recyclable products: expanding the list of recyclables will reduce that amount of waste landfilled and incinerated.


Mandatory recycling: if residents are required to recycle, less recyclable waste will be discarded rather than recycled. Fines for violations will increase the effectiveness of mandatory recycling.


Unit pricing: by charging residents per unit of trash discarded (for example purchasing trash bags), residents have an financial incentive to recycle rather than discard products in the trash.


Public education and outreach: by making people more aware of how to recycle and why it is important, recycling participation will be greater.



EPA. 2005. Municipal Solid Waste. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/facts.htm.

EPA. 2006. Municipal Solid Waste Generation, Recycling, and Disposal in the United States: Facts and Figures for 2006. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Available: http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/non-hw/muncpl/pubs/msw06.pdf.

EPA. 2008. Municipal Solid waste: Basic Information. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Updated January 3, 2008. Available: http://www.epa.gov/msw/facts.htm.