Game Theory Analysis

From Dickinson College Wiki
Revision as of 06:10, 1 May 2006 by 172.16.18.30 (talk)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Introduction | Cases | Strategy Analysis | Aggregate Model | Conclusion | Sources Used

Eastern Europe: Bulgaria

Action / Circumstance => Result

  • $10 billion debt (74% of GDP) => Moratorium on debt payments
  • Moratorium on debt payments => Negotiations with the financial institutions (IMF / World Bank)
  • Negotiations with the financial institutions => Brady plan (July 28, 1994) + IMF
  • Agreeing to the Brady plan conditions =>
    • Debt relief -> Guarantees needed for remainder of debt
    • Guarantees offered by Worl Bank and IMF -> World Bank and IMF effectively own Bulgaria's debt
    • Worl Bank + IMF own debt -> WB and IMF can demand specific economic reforms (dependancy)


  • POSITIVE effects of the Brady plan:
    • Increased credibility rating
    • Increased credibility rating => Expected increase in investment (stabilization)
    • Budget is freed from debt repayment burden
    • Government can lower obligation to the IMF and World Bank by directly purchasing Brady bonds
    • Brady bonds can be used as payment in the privatization process


  • NEGATIVE effects of the Brady plan:
    • Country becomes dependent on IMF / World Bank (shareholder interests)
    • IMF / World Bank can demand actions such as removal of trade barriers, monopolies, or special tax distortions


  • In 2002 Bulgaria exchanged the Brady bonds for global bonds =>
    • Bulgaria becomes a real participant in the global economy
    • Bought $5.137 billion worth of Brady bonds for $2.486 billion
    • $135 million collateral released
    • Debt maturity extended in time
    • Debt / GDP ratio decreased -> credit profile increased (14 times)
    • Also shows a country can make it on its own without becoming dependent on the financial institutions

South America: Argentina

Action / Circumstance => Result


Africa: Nigeria

Action / Circumstance => Result